Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Why more weapons wouldn't help Libya's rebels – at least not right away

(Read article summary)

Finbarr O'Reilly/Reuters

(Read caption) Libyan rebels retreat after forces loyal to Muammar Qaddafi attacked them near Brega in eastern Libya on March 30.

About these ads

The Libyan war is still young, and the international community is still groping for some kind of consensus on what its appropriate role should be here – not least of all, whether it should arm the rag-tag militias fighting Col. Muammar Qaddafi's forces.

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen dismissed the idea in a CNN interview yesterday, saying “we are not in Libya to arm people, but to protect people.”

He noted that UN Security Council Resolution 1973, which allows "all necessary measures" to be used in protecting Libyan civilians, authorizes the enforcement of an arms embargo. But the US has interpreted the resolution as also allowing the arming of rebels, if that step is deemed necessary.

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé told reporters on Tuesday that his country is “ready to discuss” arming the rebels “with our partners.”


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.