Dissension over Greek bailout weakens Merkel

Members of German Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition balked at the second Greek bailout, even though it passed. The vote is seen as a defeat for her austerity program.

|
Thomas Peter/Reuters
German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks during a debate before a parliamentary vote on a Greek bailout package in the Bundestag, the lower house of parliament, in Berlin, Feb. 27. The German parliament on Monday solidly backed the second bailout package for Greece.

Chancellor Angela Merkel – the driving force behind Europe's often-controversial response to its economic woes – is facing increasing domestic criticism about her eurocrisis management.

The German parliament on Monday solidly backed the second bailout package for Greece. But for the first time since she took office in 2005, Mrs. Merkel did not get the so-called chancellor’s majority, the absolute majority from within her own coalition of three center-right parties. The vote is seen as a defeat for Merkel and her policies, which are focused on austerity and budgetary discipline as measures to solve the sovereign debt crisis in the eurozone.

While no one is yet questioning her de facto eurozone leadership, an extended crisis could become a decisive factor in Merkel's political future. 

“This second bailout won’t do,” says Manfred Kolbe, a member of Merkel’s Christian Democrats, one of 20 members of Merkel's camp who refused to back her. “There is already a third one on the horizon. We are throwing good money after bad. Unless Greece becomes an economy that can compete with other eurozone members, we are wasting German taxpayers’ money.”

The chancellor conceded there was no guarantee this bailout would actually work, but warned that a Greek default could have unpredictable consequences for the financial security of Germany, the eurozone, and even the global economy. “I have to weigh risks,” Merkel said during the debate, “but I must not embark on adventures.”

For Peter Bofinger, one of Merkel’s economic advisers, the vote indicates a growing doubt about the rescue operation. “The problem is in large parts a communication failure by the government,” he says. “While it sets up billions of financial aid, the cabinet fails to impress on the public the gigantic efforts Greece makes to solve its debt problem. You cannot call Greece a bottomless pit in an attempt to meet voters’ sentiments, and still ask parliament to approve more and more credit.”

The second bailout for Greece since 2010 was approved by European leaders and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) last December, after it became apparent that a first package worth €110 billion ($148 billion) would not be enough to prevent the highly indebted country from going bankrupt. Following weeks of intense negotiations, EU finance ministers last week confirmed that Greece had fulfilled the tough conditions linked to the bailout – deep cuts in the state budget, a reduction of the minimum wage, and the lowering of pensions, among other things – and released the second package of €130 billion ($175 billion), pending the ratification of national parliaments where required.

The exact shares for each creditor country will be agreed to at another meeting of finance ministers later this week. But Germany will have to shoulder the largest part, a fact that is causing unease among a growing number of Germans. “Stop going down the wrong way,” Germany’s top-selling newspaper “Bild” told parliamentarians on Monday, and bolstered the front-page headline by a poll in which 62 percent of those surveyed said there should be no second bailout for Greece.

Ministers break ranks and talk about a Greek exit

The debate about Merkel’s euro policy has finally reached her own cabinet. Until now, she has successfully stifled criticism in her own ranks through the dictum that a “failure of the euro means a failure of the European Union.” But a day before the vote in the Bundestag, Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrichs broke the taboo and told Der Spiegel magazine that Greece might have better chances to recover economically if it left the common currency. “I don’t want to kick out Greece,” the minister said, “I’d rather create incentives for them to leave.”

“Friedrichs only voiced what many of us think,” says Thomas Silberhorn, a conservative parliamentarian who voted against the bailout package. “A return to the drachma would be better for both, Greece and the eurozone.”

But in her insistence on keeping the eurozone intact at all costs, Merkel still has strong support, including Mr. Bofinger, her economic adviser. “A Greek exit would be a fundamental change in the character of the eurozone," he says. "It would be a sign to the financial markets that the euro is not really a common currency, but rather a fixed exchange rate system from which other countries like Spain or Italy could soon depart.”

Such a perception would lead to higher interest rates for the concerned countries, argues Bofinger, and eventually to a chain reaction that could reach the core countries like France and Germany.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Dissension over Greek bailout weakens Merkel
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0228/Dissension-over-Greek-bailout-weakens-Merkel
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe