The London 7/7 bombings: 10 years later, what's changed?

Tuesday marks the 10th anniversary of the suicide bombings in London that killed 52 and injured over 700. What's changed in the last decade? 

|
Neil Hall/Reuters
A woman places a floral tribute for victims of the July 7, 2005 London bombings, at Aldgate Station in London, July 7, 2015.

On the morning of July 7, 2005, four explosions rocked the London public transit system – three on subway trains and one on a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. Fifty-two people were killed and more than 700 were injured.

The terrorist attack, known as the 7/7 bombings, came four years after 9/11 and the beginning of the Global War on Terror – a war that the British had become heavily involved in.

Today, ten years later, Londoners are looking to the future.

Tessa Jowell, a former government minister and aspiring London mayor, delivered a lecture at the the 7/7 Tavistock Square Memorial Trust last week:

“In their wicked madness the bombers presumably thought they were doing something that would be a step towards creating a different city altogether.”

“Perhaps they thought they could set the government against the people, race against race, non-Muslims against Muslims, eroding trust and understanding.”

She continued by saying, “Of course, they failed; they failed utterly.”

But not all agree with Ms. Jowell’s sentiments.

In an opinion piece for the Guardian, Mehdi Hasan says life for British Muslims has not been easy the last ten years:

“I’m sick and tired of this relentless hostility towards Muslims; the negative headlines; the climate of fear and suspicion; the constant collective blaming…I have spent the last decade appearing on TV and radio panels and phone-ins to try and challenge anti-Muslim bigotry on one hand, and violent extremism on the other. How emotionally exhausting, how dispiriting and demoralizing it is to have to publicly affirm your ‘Britishness’ and your ‘moderation’ again and again.”

He may have a point. Especially after an Islamic State militant responsible for beheading captured journalists was identified as a British citizen last year.

In an effort to combat these stereotypes of extremism, mosques across the UK will open their doors to people of all faiths this evening. Attendees will break fast with Muslim community members who are celebrating the holy month of Ramadan.

“The best way to defy the terrorist is to increase our bonds of unity, not to single out any one group of people for blame,” Dr. Shuja Shafi, Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain, told the Independent.

And Londoners are beginning to recognize this.

In a city known for its cultural diversity, inhabitants have long become accustomed to living among people of all walks of life.

But critics of multiculturalism argue that the rise in acceptance of different cultural identities has led to extremism.

“The fact is that for too long the doctrine of multiculturalism has led to immigrants establishing completely separate communities in our cities. This has led to honor killings … and the establishment of sharia law in inner-city pockets throughout the UK,” a former Archbishop of Canterbury told the Telegraph.

A new poll by YouGov says that more people think multiculturalism makes the country worse than those who believe it makes the country better.

But as Jowell said in her lecture, “A city that does not create a space for all its people will not be resilient.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The London 7/7 bombings: 10 years later, what's changed?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0707/The-London-7-7-bombings-10-years-later-what-s-changed
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe