Could Libya airstrikes point to deeper US involvement in the war against ISIS?

A Pentagon spokesman said the United States targeted a tank and two vehicles in an airstrike in Libya on Monday.

|
Goran Tomasevic/Reuters
A fighter of Libyan forces allied with the UN-backed government looks through a hole in a wall as a self-propelled artillery gun fires at Islamic State fighters during a battle in Sirte, Libya, Sunday.

The United States carried out two airstrikes on Monday in the Libyan city of Sirte, in the first of what may be an extended military campaign against the self-proclaimed Islamic State in Libya.

“Today, at the request of the Libyan Government of National Accord (GNA),” said the Pentagon in a statement, “the United States military conducted precision air strikes against ISIL targets in Sirte, Libya, to support GNA-affiliated forces seeking to defeat ISIL in its primary stronghold in Libya.”

The airstrikes come after months of intensive reconnaissance by US Special Forces in a country still mired in the turmoil that followed the Western-backed deposing of former strongman Muammar Qaddafi in 2011. And the attacks seem to augur extended involvement by the US, with Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook telling reporters that defense officials had no clear timeline for US military commitment.

“We don't have an end point at this particular moment in time,” said Mr. Cook. “But we'll be working closely with the GNA and we certainly hope that this is something that does not require a lengthy amount of time.”

Militias from the UN-backed GNA, which exercises control in the western part of Libya – though without the approval of the elected parliament based in the east – have been trying to retake Sirte from IS militants. They requested airstrikes, reports Al Jazeera, to clear terrain on the city’s outskirts where booby traps, mines, and roadside bombs had slowed their advance. Mr. Cook said Monday's airstrikes targeted a tank and two vehicles. 

The bombings were the first by the US in Libya since February, when it targeted Noureddine Chouchane, a Tunisian militant suspected of planning attacks on Western tourists and thought to be living in an IS training camp. Nearly 50 people died in that bombing, including two Serbian diplomats who had been abducted by Islamic State forces.

Unlike those earlier airstrikes, when it sought to kill people it believed to be IS leaders, the US has now lent military support to a coordinated effort with local forces.

“What’s happening now for the first time is that the United States is supporting forces on the ground that are battling the Islamic State,” said Washington Post reporter Missy Ryan in an NPR interview on Tuesday. “If it’s sustained, as Pentagon officials say they expect it to be to some extent, it’ll be really opening a new chapter in the campaign against the Islamic State, similar to what the United States is doing in Iraq and Syria, albeit on a much smaller scale.”

American military officials concluded back in March that a barrage of airstrikes against as many as 40 targets would have crippled ISIS operations in Libya, reported the New York Times. The Obama administration decided not to authorize the operations because of the fragile politics around the establishment of an interim government.

Cook told reporters on Monday that the legal justification for the strikes stemmed from a 2001 authorization for military force passed in the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks and cited by Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama as the legal framework for military actions in countries like Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Pakistan, and others.

IS has claimed Sirte since February 2015, though it did not consolidate control over the eastern coastal city until summer of that year. The Pentagon says about 1,000 IS fighters remain there, from a peak of around 6,000.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Could Libya airstrikes point to deeper US involvement in the war against ISIS?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0802/Could-Libya-airstrikes-point-to-deeper-US-involvement-in-the-war-against-ISIS
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe