Oscar Pistorius trial: Prosecutor says Olympian's testimony doesn't add up

Gerrie Nel is the lead prosecutor in the murder trial of Oscar Pistorius for the 2013 shooting death of South African model Reeva Steenkamp.

|
Craig Nieuwenhuizen/AP
State prosecutor Gerrie Nel questions Oscar Pistorius in court in Pretoria, South Africa, Friday, April 11, 2014. Pistorius is charged with the murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, on Valentines Day in 2013.

The prosecutor cross-examining Oscar Pistorius in his murder trial Friday tried to shred his version of events the night he shot and killed his girlfriend, saying they do not add up and go against how people would react in the situation the double-amputee Olympian has described.

Pistorius is charged with premeditated murder for Reeva Steenkamp's shooting death. He claims he shot the model by mistake, thinking she was an intruder about to come out the toilet and attack him. The state says he intentionally killed her by firing his pistol through a closed toilet door after they had an argument in the predawn hours of Valentine's Day last year.

Chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel led the Paralympic champion through his own account of what happened in those moments before he shot Steenkamp. Pistorius said he heard a noise in the bathroom and moved down a passageway on his stumps toward the bathroom with his pistol while screaming to his girlfriend to get down from the bed and call the police. Pistorius says he then heard a noise in the toilet that he perceived to be the sound of wood on wood, which he said made him think someone was opening the toilet door to attack him. And then, Pistorius said, he opened fire.

At each stage, Nel argued that the account was improbable, questioning why Pistorius did not establish where Steenkamp was and make sure she was OK, why he would approach the alleged danger zone if he felt vulnerable on his stumps, why Steenkamp would not respond to him and why an intruder would close himself in a toilet stall.

"If you spoke to Reeva, the two of you could have taken lots of other steps," Nel said, adding that they could have merely left the bedroom.

Pistorius said he wanted to put himself between the bathroom and the bed, where he said he thought Steenkamp was.

Nel noted in Pistorius' version of the moments before the shooting, Steenkamp "never uttered a word."

"It's not probable. It's not possible," the prosecutor said.

"She was standing behind the toilet door talking to you when you shot her," Nel put to Pistorius, citing the trajectory of the three bullets that hit her and asserting that the couple fighting was the only "reasonable explanation" for why she was standing behind the cubicle door and facing it. Steenkamp wasn't scared of anyone "other than you" Nel said.

"That's not true," Pistorius said.

The exchange dramatically capped the first week of the double-amputee Olympian's testimony at his murder trial in a Pretoria courthouse. The trial resumes on Monday, the start of its fifth week.

Earlier, Nel highlighted what he said was an inconsistency in Pistorius' testimony, noting that the Olympic runner had said Steenkamp didn't scream when he shot that night but also saying he could hear very little because his ears were "ringing" from the first gunshot.

"You knew that Reeva was behind the door and you shot at her knowing that she was behind that door," Nel said.

"That's not true, my lady," Pistorius said, addressing the judge.

Nel also argued that Pistorius was prepared to lie about an incident as far back as five years ago when he claims someone shot at him from another car on a highway to build a back story that he had a long-held fear of being attacked.

Pistorius said he saw a "muzzle flash" and heard "a banging noise" as a black Mercedes drove past him in the incident, which he said was in 2008 or 2009. Pistorius said he slowed down, turned off the highway, and eventually went to a restaurant car park and called someone to come and pick him up. Nel asked Pistorius who he called and Pistorius replied he couldn't remember.

"You cannot not remember," Nel said. It was "such a traumatic incident," the prosecutor said. Nel said Pistorius' failing to remember who he called was because "it never happened."

"It's the one night that someone almost shot you, am I right?" Nel said. Pistorius said it was.

"If I could remember who I phoned I would gladly give you their name," Pistorius said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Oscar Pistorius trial: Prosecutor says Olympian's testimony doesn't add up
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0411/Oscar-Pistorius-trial-Prosecutor-says-Olympian-s-testimony-doesn-t-add-up
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe