Jeremy Abbott vents at reporter: Are Sochi Olympics turning sour for US?

Jeremy Abbott, who finished 12th in the men's figure skating, launched into a tirade when asked about choking. In some ways, the Sochi Olympics are taking on shades of Turin. 

|
Ivan Sekretarev/AP
Jeremy Abbott in a happier moment after finishing a clean free skate at the Sochi Olympics in Russia Friday. He finished 12th. Later, he lost his cool with a reporter.

On Friday, American figure skater Jeremy Abbott made waves for all the wrong reasons, going on a tirade when a reporter insinuated that Abbott choked at major events.

On one hand, the comments are a glimpse of what we imagine many Olympians are saying in their heads as journalists stick microphones and notepads in their faces after crushing disappointments. Yet they also point to the potential dark side of America's Olympic fascination. Athletes often speak of their frustration with America's Olympic attention span – that what they do over an entire career is rendered irrelevant by the two weeks of the Olympics.

No medal and you are a failure.

On Friday night, after finishing 12th and crashing violently in the short program the night before, Abbott plainly decided he'd had enough.

With Barb Reichert, a spokeswoman for US Figure Skating standing next to him, Abbott snapped when asked whether his repeated poor performances at major international competitions opened him to criticism as a choker.

"I would just love to – alright, Barb, you're going to kill me – I just want to put my middle finger in the air and say a big 'F-you' to everyone who has ever said that to me, because they've never stood in my shoes, and they've never had to do what I've had to do," Abbott said.

"Nobody has to stand center ice in front of a million people and put an entire career on the line for eight minutes of their life when they've been doing it for 20-some years. And if you think that that's not hard, then you're a damn idiot," he continued.

Abbott supposedly spoke more in the sense of giving his unfiltered opinion than out of anger. Either way, he has a point. The media, at times, can seem heartless. This is the cold reality – the price of being an elite athlete, one might say. You have to take responsibility for your performances, and Abbott's performances on the international stage certainly beg the question that was asked.

Yet that sort of question, if not asked delicately, comes across as malicious and antagonizing. If that was your son, your heart would break for him having to answer such a question.

Usually, athletes handle it with grace – and particularly at the Olympics. They know it's part of the deal. Win a medal and you're the king for a week, a month, a year. But lose – and, in particular, if you're prickly about it – and you can become a target.

Ask Bode Miller.

And that's what this feels like, in a way. In Turin, America did well in the medal table, finishing second overall with 25 medals. But in many of the events Americans were watching, there was failure after perceived failure, and the tone turned negative.

Miller was the "choker" then, and he had far more on his résumé than Abbott. He had been the World Cup overall champion a year before and would be again in 2008. Then there was the feud between speedskating teammates Shani Davis and Chad Hedrick.

The same general mood is playing out here.

While American athletes seemed to have few problems with Sochi, the overall tone coming from American coverage was negative even before the Olympics began. Since then, many of America's most prominent athletes have badly underperformed. Shaun White pulled out of the slopestyle then missed the podium in halfpipe. US speedskaters are blaming poorly designed suits for their string of shocking results. And Friday night marked the worst figure skating performance for the American men since 1936.

All this, and the US is still standing joint top of the overall medal table with 13.

But once a narrative turns negative, it can be hard to reverse.

"Whatever other people have to say about me, that's their own problem because I'm freaking proud of what I've done and I'm not going to apologize for anything," Abbott said.

But he might well have to apologize.

He knew he shouldn't say what he did, but he did anyway.

For the American Olympian, so disciplined in diet and training, the discipline of forbearance is no less imperative. American Olympians are packaged products as much as athletes. F-bombs are not a part of that package, and Abbott knows it.

The life of the American Olympian is thankless in so many ways, and this is just one of them.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Jeremy Abbott vents at reporter: Are Sochi Olympics turning sour for US?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Olympics/2014/0214/Jeremy-Abbott-vents-at-reporter-Are-Sochi-Olympics-turning-sour-for-US
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe