Modern field guide to security and privacy

FBI chief says government lacks ability to crack iPhone

At a House Judiciary Committee Tuesday, FBI Director James Comey said that no agency in government had the ability to access the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino, Calif., shooters – a notion disputed by legislators and Apple's lawyers. 

|
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
FBI Director James Comey testified on Capitol Hill in September on cybertheats. Mr. Comey has warned that strong end-to-end encryption on consumer devices can harm terrorist and law enforcement investigations.

FBI Director James Comey said his agency needs Apple's help to access the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino, Calif., shooters because the government doesn't have the technical ability to break into the phone.

"We have engaged all parts of the US government to see if anybody has a way – short of asking Apple to do it," Mr. Comey said Tuesday at a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee.

But lawmakers who grilled Comey for nearly three hours appeared skeptical that the FBI could not find a way to get into an iPhone used by Syed Rizwan Farook, who helped plot the December terrorist attack in California that left 14 people dead.

"You have a multibillion dollar budget," Rep. Darrell Issa (R) of California told Comey. "Is the burden so high on you that you could not defeat this product either by getting the source code and changing it or through some other means?"

Comey said the government has not tried to access the source code for the device confiscated after the San Bernardino shootings.

Tuesday's testimony comes amid a growing legal standoff between Apple and the federal government over Mr. Farook's phone. While a California judge ordered the tech giant to help the FBI access data on the phone, Apple filed a motion last week to dismiss that order on the grounds that the request was overly burdensome on the company and would irreparably harm the security of all of its customers.

Apple has called on Congress to help resolve the debate around the ability of law enforcement agencies to access data on iPhones.

At Tuesday's hearing, Apple’s top in-house lawyer argued that building special password-busting software for the FBI that break into one phone would open the door to other law enforcement agencies asking for the same tool. What's more, he said, it could fall into the hands of malicious actors who could use it to crack other phones.

"Essentially we are throwing open the doors and allowing the very act of decryption to take place," said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s senior vice president and general counsel.

On Monday, Apple won a significant legal victory in a related case. A federal magistrate judge in New York denied a US government request to access data from a locked iPhone captured in connection with a 2014 drug case.

Judge James Orenstein said the 1789 All Writs Act statute, also the basis for the federal government’s case in San Bernardino, does not give the investigators sufficiently expansive authority to extract iPhone data.

The FBI's Comey defended the right to privacy during the hearing – and argued that the law enforcement officials only sought access to Farook’s phone. But he worried that without the technology to access iPhones and other encrypted devices, investigators might lack the tools to hunt down terrorists and criminals.

"We’re moving to a place where there are warrant-proof places in our lives," Comey said. "That’s a world that we’ve never lived in before in the United States. That has profound consequences for public safety."

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to FBI chief says government lacks ability to crack iPhone
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/2016/0301/FBI-chief-says-government-lacks-ability-to-crack-iPhone
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe