Would Western aid to Ukraine be a setback?

Conditions attached to the offer could place Ukraine once again at the center of tug-a-war between the West and Russia. 

|
Gleb Garanich / Reuters
Anti-government protesters stand guard on a barricade that faces a cordon of riot police in Kiev on Feb. 3. President Viktor Yanukovych returned to work on Monday, four days after going on sick leave, facing a continued crisis and widespread opposition protests.

Testing the assumptions behind the headlines. 

The European Union and the United States are considering an aid package for Ukraine that would represent the West’s most significant effort to date to bring an end to political violence that flared after Ukraine’s president walked away from an EU trade agreement in November.

But the rescue money could actually put the political situation back at “square one,” says Amanda Paul, an analyst at the European Policy Center in Brussels. Its delivery depends on economic and political reforms enacted by a new cabinet, which might place Ukraine once again at the center of tug-a-war between the West and Russia – one reason the street protests emerged in the first place.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton told The Wall Street Journal that Western nations were ready to provide an aid package, one that “won’t be small,” to bring the kind of stability needed to move the country beyond the protracted conflict that has taken at least six lives and injured 1,000 people.

The package aims to get Ukraine “moving toward elections that will be done freely and fairly,” she told the paper, with a “broad-based interim government.”

The move would boost the opposition and protesters, who poured into the streets after Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, under threat of financial sanction from Russia, pulled out of an agreement that would have put the post-Soviet country more in line with EU standards and norms, paving the way for future EU membership.

The reports of an aid package come as US Secretary of State John Kerry, as well as European diplomats, met with opposition leaders on the sidelines of an annual security conference in Munich over the weekend.

If Russia dismisses the effort as an attempt at blackmail and threatens to withhold its aid, it could hand the decisionmaking back to Russian President Vladmir Putin, says Ms. Paul. “You can change what happens in Ukraine but you can’t change the way Russia thinks,” she says. “Ukraine is still going to be stuck in the middle.”

Mr. Yanukovych might today however be more willing to accept an aid package, and the conditions placed on the country. That is because Russia announced last week, after Yanukovych dismissed his prime minister, that it was withholding an installment of a $15 billion package promised by Moscow last December as a counter to the earlier EU deal. That package was ostensibly offered as an unconditional one. 

Yanukovych originally walked away from the EU association agreement because he said it would hurt the Ukrainian economy. Protests have grown increasingly violent as the government has cracked down on protesters, many of whom have reportedly redirected their anger away from the Ukrainian policy tilt to Russia and toward Yanukovych himself. They want him to step down immediately.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Would Western aid to Ukraine be a setback?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Reality-Check/2014/0203/Would-Western-aid-to-Ukraine-be-a-setback
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe