Gay rights in America: How states stand on gay marriage and 6 other issues

The tapestry of federal and state laws surrounding gay rights is enormously complex. Here is a look at each state's laws regarding issues ranging from gay marriage to hate crimes to hospital visitation. 

2. Adoption

AP Photo/Columbus Dispatch, Chris Russel
Jim Olive holds the hand of his adoptive son, Bryce, while he and his partner attend a service at the King Avenue United Methodist Church in Columbus, Ohio, in June 2005.

(Updated June 13, 2013)

• Federal: No statutes.

• States: The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) parents vary widely among states, and laws regarding adoption are often unclear. All states allow a single individual – regardless of sexual orientation – the right to petition to adopt a child, but fewer than half allow a same-sex couple to petition for joint adoption, and some have banned adoption by same-sex parents. Many states restrict adoption by sexual orientation or marital status, and because mostly local courts handle adoptions, some judges may accept or deny petitions from other judges in the same state, causing ambiguous rights for same-sex parents. 

Full joint adoption rights (22 states and D.C.)
Same-sex couples are allowed to petition for joint adoption:

Full second-parent adoption rights (18 states and D.C.)
In these states, a person can adopt the biological or adopted child of his or her partner:

  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • District of Columbia
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Vermont
  • Washington

Some rights (51)

All US states and the District of Columbia allow a single individual, gay or not, the right to petition to adopt a child.

No rights (3)
Ban same-sex couples from petitioning for a joint adoption: 

  • Michigan
  • Mississippi
  • Utah 

Bans second-parent adoption:

  • Kentucky
  • Nebraska
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
2 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.