3 biographies about the queen celebrating a Diamond Jubilee

3 new biographies of Queen Elizabeth II, all released in time for the queen's Diamond Jubilee

3. 'Her Majesty,' by Robert Hardman

British journalist Robert Hardman, author of Her Majesty, is also mighty fond of the queen, and he tries hard to keep attention away from any failures by Her Royal Highness or her family. There’s even an item in the index for “Royal family: alleged dysfunctionality,” leading to a page where Hardman airily dismisses the d-word as “lazy media shorthand.” 

To borrow a phrase from a British scandal: He would say that, wouldn’t he? Hardman’s overly sympathetic and often dull book paints the royal family in a glowing light, reflecting an attitude that presumably convinced several members of the royal clan to give him interviews in which they say little of interest.

Hardman does, however, quote the queen’s son Prince Andrew as actually saying something revealing: “we’re not that different to anybody else. It’s just a slightly different reality.” (Talk about someone who lives in a different world!)

In all the hundreds of pages in these books, many queenly questions remain unanswered.

What does she say to prime ministers during those private chats? It appears that she acts as a confidential sounding board, but we don’t know for sure. What did she really think of Princess Diana? And what on earth does she carry in her famous purses? (Stories differ.)

We may never gain a great understanding of the queen until after her death, when her lifelong diaries will be released. But it seems likely that her natural reserve will keep her most-private thoughts out of the history books.

Even so, we still can hope to discover that this onetime princess, whose life has hardly been a fairy tale, has managed to live happily ever after.

3 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.