Fenway Park: 5 new books about the beloved ballpark

Boston is swimming in Fenway Park history these days as the old ball yard celebrates its 100th anniversary. The official celebration takes place on April 20, 2012, when the Red Sox take on longtime rivals the New York Yankees. The two teams squared off in the first regular season game ever played at Fenway on April 20, 1912.  In anticipation of all the hoopla surrounding the centennial, a wave of books about big-league’s oldest park and Boston’s most popular tourist attraction has crashed onto the market.  Here are reviews of five Fenway books we’d pencil into our starting lineup.

Michael Dwyer/AP

1. 'Fenway Park: A Salute to the Coolest, Cruelest, Longest-Running Major League Baseball Stadium in America,' by John Powers and Ron Driscoll

This book, as the saying goes, hits the ball out of the park.  It has it all: compelling history and substantial sidebars, extensive timelines of each of Fenway’s decades, and the best photo collection imaginable.  Plus there’s a poster-size blueprint of the park and a four-page graphic foldout about the Green Monster. (Did you know that the initials of former team owner Tom Yawkey and his wife appear in Morse code on the manual scoreboard?)

A major reason that this book stands apart is that it’s able to draw from the deep journalistic resources of Boston’s premier daily newspaper, The Boston Globe. The Globe has one of the best sports sections in the country, and it shows in this history coauthored and edited by John Powers, a longtime Globe sportswriter, and Ron Driscoll, a former Globe copy editor.

Many of the images in this book are not found elsewhere and the sidebars are a particular strength. The latter touch on a wide array of topics, from efforts to determine the actual distance of the left field wall from home plate, a topic that seems intentionally shrouded in mystery (310 feet is the currently accepted distance), to the two nighttime power outages at the ballpark. During the first of the blackouts in 1981 public address announcer Sherm Feller led the crowd in an a cappella rendition of the national anthem and used a bullhorn to read out the starting lineups.  

Then there are the sidebar profiles of people whose lives are integral to the Fenway story. Take, for example, Arthur D’Angelo. His family emigrated to Boston from Italy to flee Mussolini’s dictatorship in 1938. D’Angelo and his twin brother spoke no English and knew nothing about baseball upon arriving in the US at age 14, but by 1946 they were hawking pennants outside Fenway Park, a business that eventually led to opening one of the largest souvenir stories in the country across the street. Today D’Angelo says the business sells more caps than anybody in the world. And, of course, he became an avid baseball fan.

Women are also part of Fenway’s lore. Lib Dooley began attending Red Sox games during World War II and eventually witnessed 4,000 consecutive games from her seat near the team’s on-deck circle. No less an authority that Ted Williams called her “the greatest Red Sox fan there’ll ever be."

Another legendary figure, though a less visible one, is Helen Robinson, who worked the team’s phone switchboard for 60 years. Here, too, she had the respect of Williams, who admired her ability to keep all personal calls confidential and maintain a cheerful disposition. He called her “Sunshine.”

What some may have forgotten about Fenway’s modern history is that in 1999 the owners of the Red Sox had a plan to build a brand new Fenway Park approximately where the old ballpark sits. To appease opponents, the owners were going to pay homage to the storied stadium structure by keeping certain pieces as memorials, including part of the Green Monster, the 1912 brick entrance, and the infield. Such olive branches weren’t enough, and when the new owners took over in 2002, they undertook a 10-year project to improve and enlarge Fenway.

The result, of course, has led to this year’s Fenway Park centennial and surely the largest publishing love-in any American sports stadium has ever experienced.  

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.