5 unconventional sports books

The topics and approaches taken by many sports books are predictable. Here, though, are a handful that are delightfully offbeat in various ways.

1. ‘Twelve Yards: The Art and Psychology of the Perfect Penalty Kick,’ by Ben Lyttleton

Soccer’s penalty-kick, especially in a game-ending shootout, is the height of sports drama, a showdown at 12 paces (actually 12 yards) of a goalkeeper and kicker. It’s a confrontation that seems to heavily favor the kicker given the short distance and the yawning goal, but that doesn't lessen the suspense because a miss usually is an emotional dagger and sometimes spells devastating defeat. Seeing the potential to analyze this pressure-filled duel, Ben Lyttleton has devoted an entire book to a kick that looks simple but presents its own mental and physical challenges.

Here’s an excerpt from Twelve Yards

“As a younger reporter, I went through a phase of asking strikers what was in their mind before they took a shot, what their thought process was as they made a certain run and completed a certain move. I stopped asking when the same answer – ‘Nothing, it’s just instinct, innate?’ – came back again and again.

“But with penalties, it is different. There is time between the award of the penalty and its execution, time for the mind to play an important role. And time – especially if it’s a shoot-out – for commentators or pundits to say something fatuous like ‘Well, you can’t practice for this kind of moment.’ Try telling that to the darts player who throws a hundred treble-twenties a day, the snooker player who cuts the black into the bottom pocket over and over again, or the golfer who spends hours, daily, on his putting.”

“The ability to control your mind in the build-up to these shots, in all these sports, can be decisive.”

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.