4 basketball books for hoops-hungry readers

Here are a handful of recent releases about both college and pro basketball.

3. ‘The Legends Club: Dean Smith, Mike Krzyzewski, Jim Valvano, and an Epic College Basketball Rivalry,’ by John Feinstein

During his long sportswriting career, John Feinstein has become the leader of total-immersion, behind-the-scenes books, with a handful of bestsellers to his credit. Here his deep-dive is into one of his favorite subjects, college basketball, and specifically a fierce rivalry among three coaching giants: Duke’s Mike Krzyzewski (“Coach K”), North Carolina’s Dean Smith, and North Carolina State’s Jim Valvano. Feinstein got to know all three men while covering their battles in the Atlantic Coast Conference’s toughest and tightest geographic neighborhood – North Carolina’s Research Triangle. Their careers overlapped during the 1980s, leading to a succession of megaton confrontations both on the court and on the recruiting trail. Although Valvano and Smith have passed, Feinstein decided several years ago that the rivalry of these Hall of Fame coaches cried out to be told in revealing firsthand detail.  

Here’s an excerpt from The Legends Club:

“[Dean] Smith had always seen Duke as North Carolina’s primary and most dangerous rival. As good as N.C. State had been at times, especially during the David Thompson era, he rarely recruited against Norm Sloan or Jim Valvano. On the other hand, he almost always had to recruit against Duke. The two schools – regardless of who was coaching at Duke – were selling essentially the same thing: big-time basketball and a primo liberal arts education for anyone who decided to pursue it in those hours when he wasn’t working to become an NBA player. Very few players who had the chance to play in the ACC were thinking about any post college career other than basketball.

“Additionally, it was a simple, ironclad fact that Duke people and North Carolina people looked down their noses at State. To them, it was the ‘cow college’ – it had been founded as an agricultural school – and the Raleigh campus, while nice enough, couldn’t compare with the aesthetics at either Duke or North Carolina.”

3 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.