8 new baseball books for Opening Day

Here are excerpts from eight new titles on baseball.

2. ’Tom Yawkey: Patriarch of the Boston Red Sox,’ by Bill Nowlin

It’s hard to imagine a more timely baseball book than the one Bill Nowlin has written about former Red Sox owner Tom Yawkey. Normally Yawkey, who died in 1976, wouldn’t be a current topic of conversation. What has brought his name back into the headlines, however, is drive to change Yawkey Way – the street that runs along Fenway Park – back to Jersey Street. Propelling the effort is the desire to distance the club from the racist clouds thought to linger from the Yawkey era, which saw the Red Sox become the last major-league team to integrate. Although this more-than-500-page biography doesn’t directly address the current street-naming controversy, it does shine a lot of light on a man who has remained something of a mystery despite owning the Red Sox for an incredible 44 years.

Here’s an excerpt from Tom Yawkey:

“In an appraisal of Tom Yawkey’s life, it seems unavoidable that we revisit the question of Yawkey and race. This issue keeps cropping up like the proverbial bad penny. Had Tom Yawkey been a racist? There appears to be no conclusive evidence one way or another. It remains an inescapable fact that the Red Sox were the last Major League team to field a black ballplayer. As sole owner of the Red Sox, Yawkey had the opportunity – for many years – to take even a symbolic step toward desegregation. He could have done so during World War II, building on the fact that black soldiers were giving their lives to defend America. He could have brought in one, two, or more talented black ballplayers and forged a a historic pioneering role for himself and the Red Sox.

“Boston was, after all, where the American Revolution began, with the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party, and the battles of Lexington and Concord. It was also, thanks to Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison, in the forefront of the abolitionist movement. It’s not as though Yawkey couldn’t have said the ‘right’ things and reaped media credit.”

2 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.