City

P.D. Smith takes a thorough and engaging look at the urban lifestyle more than half the planet has now embraced – for better or for worse.

City By P.D. Smith Bloomsbury USA 400 pp.

Henry David Thoreau and his ilk notwithstanding, we humans have been running away from nature for millennia – that is, when we are not despoiling it. We much prefer the works of man. Indeed, as P.D. Smith points out in his latest book City: A Guidebook for the Urban Age, many early cultures viewed the city as divinely inspired as opposed to some pastoral idyll, such as the Garden of Eden. More recently, former presidential candidate Rick Santorum termed environmentalism a “false theology” that places concern for nature above the needs of humankind.

Voting with our feet, we have become urban, if not exactly urbane. More than half of us – 3.3 billion strong, according to the author – now dwell in cities. A small mathematical point here: the United States Census Bureau pegged the world’s population in March at more than seven billion, so 47 percent would be more accurate. Nitpicking aside, that percentage is expected to rise to 75 by midcentury. Only 1 in 10 called cities home in 1900.

The bright lights clearly have gone to our heads. Many of us who were raised on country sunshine now get only fleeting glimpses of it thanks to smog, skyscrapers, subways, and the hubbub of metropolitan living (there’s no percentage in looking up when navigating a city). Many of us have forsaken the familiar in favor of the new and the different. For fledgling urbanites, the city is awash in strangers. It is a big step.

Many are lured to the lights for economic reasons, others out of sheer boredom or raw ambition. Urban life, as country singer Dottie West concedes, is without question “more excitin’.”  It is a place to do and create things, to meet new people, to establish a new identity, to make one’s mark in a big pond – assuming, that is, one survives. Well into the last century, cities were notoriously unhealthy. Nowhere else was the death rate nearly as high as in places like London, and since burials exceeded births, population growth required a steady stream of immigrants from the provinces. To cite one catastrophic example, in 1348 the Black Death killed off half of London’s sixty thousand residents. Those who could, like the Royals, fled to the countryside. The Plague kept returning, and London kept growing.

Modern cities represent an improvement in many ways and are now considered “greener” than the suburban and rural alternatives, according to Smith: “New Yorkers are responsible for the emission of many times more greenhouse gases than the inhabitants of Mumbai, but those same New Yorkers produce only about a third of the carbon dioxide of the typical American.”

But all is not well with modern megalopolises: there are more and more of them and growth is often willy-nilly. Sixty years ago, New York City was the only place with more than 10 million residents. Today there are 19 such behemoths, and Smith reports that one in three urbanites lives in a slum. One reason Mumbai is “highly sustainable” is that its 30 million people are packed in like proverbial sardines. Most Indian city dwellers have 10 square feet of personal space, while their American counterpart enjoys 900.

Smith, an independent writer and researcher, has penned a thorough and often engaging account of urban life, from the Uruk in Sumer and the Aztec capitol Tenochitlán to Tokyo, currently the planet’s largest burg with 35 million people. He covers it all in his guidebook, from shopping and public transit to architecture and red light districts. While a wonderful reference source and eminently readable, the book suffers from a lack of narrative flow. It leaps from one topic to another without a fig leaf of transition, much like a textbook. The reader is left to connect the dots. While this was clearly intentional, it is somewhat disorienting.

Still, Smith’s mastery of the material and his insights overcome such issues, for example, this explanation of urban sensibilities: “You are repeatedly thrown together with unfamiliar people and you have to make snap judgments based on superficial evidence, such as how they dress and speak, or whether their smile is trustworthy or suspicious. These random encounters are at the heart of the urban drama, a performance in which we are all players.”

He concludes that the environmental and social challenges of the 21st century will be won or lost in the city. Amen to that.

David Holahan is a regular contributor to the Monitor's Books section.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to City
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2012/0712/City
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe