Lack of diversity in book world continues to stir debate

When Book Expo America Bookcon announced its panel lineup, critics cried foul that all 30 authors were white.

|
Dmitry Kiper
Author Junot Diaz is one of the writers who has been speaking about the need for more diversity in literature, specifically attacking MFA programs, calling the one in which he participated 'too white.'

Does the book world have a diversity problem?

First there was the news that male writers enjoy disproportionate representation in the literary world, both as reviewers and as reviewed.

Then we learned men appear to out-represent women even in children’s literature, traditionally the domain of women.

Finally, there was this jarring news: that less than 3 percent of children’s books surveyed in 2013 were about black people – and even fewer by black authors. 

The consequence of that homogeneity was on display at a Book Expo America Bookcon readers’ convention this month in New York, when the announcement of an all-star lineup of children’s writers provoked an uproar. The problem? Every one of the 30 writers – and one cat – lauded were white. 

“There are more cats than people of color” on the list, Jeff O’Neal, founder of BookRiot, a book news and commentary site, wrote of the announcement, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Considering the recent outburst of one of the book world’s reigning stars, perhaps the apparent diversity problems in literature are no surprise.

Award-winning Dominican-American author Junot Diaz recently launched a broadside against the institutions that groom many of the literary community’s best writers: MFA programs.

“I didn’t have a great workshop experience. Not at all. In fact, by the start of my second year, I was like: get me the [expletive] out of here,” Díaz writes in an introductory essay about his time at Cornell’s MFA program in the 1990s. “So what was the problem?” Diaz continued in “a ferocious critique of the racial disparity and “whiteness” of American creative writing programs,” as the Los Angeles Times calls it. “Oh, just the standard problem of MFA programs. That [expletive] was too white.”

According to the Los Angeles Times, Diaz explained that most MFA programs “have few faculty members of color, and the aesthetic of those programs is informed by a narrow vision of what contemporary literature can and should be.”

And it’s a flaw that, by some accounts, is playing out across the literary community, as evident in diversity problems in book recognition, review, and representation.

It is a troubling trend, as we explained in an earlier post on the lack of diversity in children’s books:

“Books shape our understanding of the world and our understanding of ourselves, an occurrence even more pronounced in children. When parts of our society are scarcely represented in the books we read, we’re less inclined to know, relate to, and value those groups. Even more troubling, when minority readers, especially children, don’t see themselves represented in the books they read, they don’t receive the validation and affirmation of self that reading provides.”

Cognizant of the danger such a lack of diversity represents, a group of 22 authors, publishers, and bloggers have launched a We Need Diverse Books campaign.

“Now is the time to raise our voices into a roar that can’t be ignored,” the group’s manifesto declares. “We need to spread the word far and wide… So that the organizers of BEA and every big conference and festival out there gets the message that diversity is important to everyone.” 

The campaign has urged participants to use the hashtag #WeNeedDiverseBooks, participate in a Twitter chat, and buy and borrow diverse books in a “Diversify Your Shelves” initiative.

It’s a move in the right direction, but if the diversity problems in the book world are real, it’s just the start of a long road ahead.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Lack of diversity in book world continues to stir debate
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0506/Lack-of-diversity-in-book-world-continues-to-stir-debate
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe