Retirement planning 101: Seven questions you need to answer

6. Any role for ETFs or individual stocks and bonds?

Business Wire/File
William Rhind and Fred Jheon of ETF Securities pose on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in this 2010 file photo. The company offers several gold and other precious metal ETFs that make it easier to invest in metals.

The easy option for most retirement savers is to put money in mutual funds. In turn, each mutual fund typically has holdings of stocks or bonds.
 
But mutual funds aren't your only option. There's also a close sibling called exchange-traded funds (ETFs). And there's the opportunity to buy individual investments (like shares in Google or Gillette) on your own. These options are often accessible not just in brokerage accounts but also when you're saving in a tax-sheltered IRA (Individual Retirement Arrangement).
 
ETFs are like mutual funds in many ways. You buy shares of a fund that holds a large pool of investments. Some ETFs track stock market indexes, or invest in major classes of bonds.
 
With ETFs, the "exchange traded" part is important. You can buy or sell your shares any time during the financial market's trading day, whereas mutual fund transactions typically occur at the end of the trading day, even if you placed your order in the morning or the night before.
 
But some researchers have found that ETFs have greater "tracking error" than mutual funds typically do. Tracking error is when a fund's performance deviates from the stock index that the fund aims to mimic, 

 
And consider per-transaction commissions, as well as annual management fees ("expense ratios"), when weighing the costs of ETFs vs. mutual funds.
 
If you buy individual stocks or bonds, remember not to put too many of your eggs in one basket. One of the most common mistakes, potentially tragic, arises when workers put lots of their savings in the stock of their employer. If that one stock fails to keep up with the broader market, or plunges (think Enron back in 2001), it has an outsized impact on your standard of living.

6 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.