Shirtless no more: Can Abercrombie & Fitch widen its appeal?

Abercrombie & Fitch announced it will make changes to some of its longstanding brand policies, including putting shirts on its male models. Will these policies improve its bottom line, or is it simply too late?

|
Mario Anzuoni/Reuters
Abercrombie & Fitch announced new store policies.

Abercrombie models will now wear shirts. And they won’t be called models anymore.

In a statement released Friday, teen apparel store Abercrombie & Fitch said the chain will revamp its policies and no longer use employees’ physical appearance as a selling point. The changes come in an effort to boost sales, which dropped 10 percent last year.

Will toning down the store’s infamous hyper-sexualization help the brand’s image, or is it already too late?

Abercrombie said that with the policy changes comes a desire to move forward. The brand went through a rough phase in the media – long-time CEO Michael Jeffries stated in 2013 that the brand was only for “cool kids.” In the last few years, the company has also faced multiple lawsuits alleging discrimination in hiring practices. Mr. Jeffries retired in December, giving the brand the space it needs to reinvent itself.

“We are focused on the future, not the past, and there is complete alignment that these are the right changes,” said Abercrombie brand president Christos Angelides, according to CNN Money.

One of the most obvious changes: Abercrombie will discontinue use of shirtless male models in stores and advertising. Store clerks, formerly referred to as models, will be called brand representatives. Abercrombie also committed to making its employee demographic more diverse and inclusive of physical appearances, body types, and ethnicities.

But employees are not the only ones facing changes. Stores will also receive makeovers, as scent, lighting, and decor are updated, to give shoppers a “more pleasurable shopping experience,” reported CNN Money. The company's once-ubiquitous “sexualized marketing,” will also come to an end. Racy images will be removed from photos, shopping bags, and gift cards.

These rebranding efforts come amid other changes meant to revive sales. Last summer the company removed its once-prized logo in response to decreasing brand allegiances and a desire for more individual style among teens. The store is also admitted to testing nearly 100 percent of its product line last summer to gauge demand, a significant financial investment that may or may not pay off.

Michael Carter, former writer for the Motley Fool, says that perhaps the company is doing too much too fast to create positive change for the brand. 

“Often when a business has many ideas it lacks focus on any one idea. This might be the case for Abercrombie & Fitch right now. With the company making so many changes at the same time, it might have a hard time pinpointing what works and what doesn't,” Mr. Carter wrote after Abercrombie’s changes last summer.

Younger consumers are looking for more than just branding; more than ever, customers purchase products based on corporate philosophies and brands they believe better society.

“For the first time, ‘social consumers’ are willing to put their money where their ideals are,” said David Giannetto, a business consultant and author of “Big Social Mobile,” in a previous Monitor story. “This is different behavior than previous generations, where their ideals did not influence their actual propensity to buy, their loyalty, or price sensitivity.”

With Abercrombie moving away from its “exclusive” approach to gaining customers and committing to diversity and acceptance, they could see improvement. But only time will tell.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Shirtless no more: Can Abercrombie & Fitch widen its appeal?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/0424/Shirtless-no-more-Can-Abercrombie-Fitch-widen-its-appeal
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe