Will electric cars kill utility grids? No, study says.

One popular criticism of electric cars is that they will cause problems for our electrical grids. But electric cars are unlikely to trouble electric grids, even as far more of them hit the roads.

|
Jeff Barnard/AP/File
A Nissan Leaf tops off it's battery in Central Point, Ore., at one of the charging stations along Interstate 5. If you didn’t take advantage of a wide array of tax credits and deductions last year, it looks like you’ll be out of luck in 2014. Tax credits for certain electric cars though continue into 2014.

One of the popular criticisms of electric cars is that, as more of them roam our roads and are charged in garages at night, electrical grids will struggle and fail under the pressure.

It's popular because it seems plausible--while we're all used to having electrical goods in our houses, few use quite so much power for quite so long as a charging electric car.

As is often the case, it turns out to be a misconception--electric cars are unlikely to trouble electric grids, even as far more of them hit the roads.

Navigant Research suggests that part of the misconception comes from misunderstanding just how little energy electric cars use--and therefore require when charging.

According to the Energy Information Administration's Residential Energy Consumption Survey, the average U.S. household consumed 11,321 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity in 2009.

Using average fuel consumption of 24 mpg, a gasoline vehicle doing 12,000 miles a year is even more energy-intensive--consuming the equivalent of 16,000 kWh.

If electric vehicles were that inefficient, they'd more than double a home's energy requirements. Doing that with every household in the country--or even a fraction of the homes--would result in a massive spike in demand. Bad news for the grid.

Luckily, plug-in cars are vastly more efficient when it comes to using energy.

Over the same 12,000 miles, the typical battery electric vehicle adds just a third to home electricity demand, and the average plug-in hybrid about 37 percent. Utilities are only collecting an extra $450 to $520 a year from BEV and plug-in hybrid owners, at the average residential rate of 12 cents per kWh.

Navigant says only small changes to the grid would be required--and much of the grid has already been upgraded to cope with demand from air conditioning units during the summer.

Since feedback from plug-in charging has shown the cars are rarely charged at peak times, the increase in grid load is modest.

Real-world data from utilities has already shown that existing levels of electric cars have made virtually no impact on local grids. Last year, PG&E in California said it hadupgraded only 12 neighborhood grids out of 10,000 service checks.

The CEO of a Texas utility also dismissed any concerns back in 2012. Even given the influx of extra plug-in cars since then, it seems the utilities themselves are unconcerned.

Navigant even suggests that electric vehicles will be beneficial for utilities. They won't have to spend much upgrading the grid: local distribution transformer updates, at the most. Renewables integration helps balance load on the grid, too. And ultimately, many utilities will make a little extra money from electric car owners charging their cars each night.

Which rather begs the question: Why does everyone think electric cars will kill power grids?...

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will electric cars kill utility grids? No, study says.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2014/0121/Will-electric-cars-kill-utility-grids-No-study-says
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe