Electric car range fluctuates in extreme weather, reports AAA

AAA reports that its own testing shows rough weather can negatively impact an electric vehicle's range, but the organization cautioned that electric motors still offer less maintenance than traditional engines and other benefits.

|
Ben Gray/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution/AP/File
In this Jan. 28, 2014 file photo traffic inches along in Atlanta as a winter storm coats the region with snow and ice. AAA is reporting that an electric vehicle's performance might suffer in bad weather.

We've known for some time that battery range in electric vehicles can fluctuate in response to temperature. However, studies and simulations have produced varying estimates of how much range owners can expect to lose. 

New tests conducted by AAA aren't the final word on the matter, but they could give consumers a glimpse of what to expect during the hottest and coldest months.

To carry out its tests, AAA used a 2014 Ford Focus Electric Vehicle, a 2012 Mitsubishi iMIEV, and a 2013 Nissan Leaf. According to AAA: 

"Vehicles were tested for city driving to mimic stop-and-go traffic, and to better compare with EPA ratings listed on the window sticker..... Each vehicle completed a driving cycle for moderate, hot and cold climates following standard EPA-DOE test procedures. The vehicles were fully charged and then 'driven' on a dynamometer in a climate-controlled room until the battery was fully exhausted."

When tested at the moderate temperature of 75 degrees Fahrenheit, AAA says the three vehicles averaged 105 miles per charge. After the thermostat was cranked up to 95 degrees, however, that range plummeted to just 69 miles.

The batteries performed even worse in cold weather. When the vehicles were tested at 20 degrees Fahrenheit, they averaged just 43 miles -- a 57 percent reduction in range.

It's important to note that AAA didn't conduct these tests to dissuade consumers from purchasing electric cars. On the contrary, AAA seems pretty fond of EVs. John Nielsen, the managing director for AAA Automotive Engineering and Repair, says quite sensibly that "Electric motors provide smooth operation, strong acceleration, require less maintenance than internal combustion engines, and for many motorists offer a cost effective option. However, EV drivers need to carefully monitor driving range in hot and cold weather."

OUR TAKE

Electric vehicles and the battery technology they employ are still very new, so any data that's generated about them can be useful. However, there are a couple of problems with AAA's tests:

1. The limited sample set. AAA produced some intriguing findings, but ultimately, we want to see more than three vehicles put through their paces. Not only would we like to see results from a range of electric models -- including the Tesla Model S and the Chevrolet Volt -- we'd also like to see AAA test different versions of the same model (e.g. both a 2012 Leaf and a 2014 Leaf).

2. The lack of real-world testing. Dynamometers are important tools, but we want to know how electric vehicles perform in real-world environments, where temperatures fluctuate and landscapes undulate. Would cars perform the same? Better? Worse? Inquiring minds want to know. 

If you've considered purchasing an electric car, let us know how AAA's tests affect (or don't affect) your thinking.

___________________________________________

Follow The Car Connection on FacebookTwitter and Google+.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Electric car range fluctuates in extreme weather, reports AAA
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2014/0321/Electric-car-range-fluctuates-in-extreme-weather-reports-AAA
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe