Study: Most Americans are afraid of self-driving cars

But even though fully autonomous cars haven't yet rolled into showrooms, many drivers already own cars with autonomous features.

|
Tony Avelar/AP/File
Google's self-driving car during a demonstration at the Google campus in Mountain View, Calif.

A new study from AAA says that 75 percent of motorists are afraid of self-driving cars, and only 20 percent would trust an autonomous vehicle to chauffeur them around town.

The funny thing is, even though fully autonomous cars haven't yet rolled into showrooms, many drivers already own cars with autonomous features. Furthermore, AAA found that 61 percent of drivers want systems like automated braking, adaptive cruise control, and lane-keeping assist on their next car.

Their reasons for wanting those features vary by generation, and to some degree by sex. As AAA explains:

Baby Boomers are more likely to cite safety as a reason they want semi-autonomous features on their next vehicle (89 percent) than Millennials (78 percent).

Millennials are more likely to cite convenience (75 percent) and wanting the latest technology (36 percent) compared to older generations.

Women are more likely to cite reducing stress as a reason for wanting the technology (50 percent) than men (42 percent)

But what about the other 39 percent who don't want autonomous features on their next vehicle? According to AAA:

  • 84 percent believe that they can drive better than a computer (fun fact: they can't);
  • 60 percent believe that the technology is too new and untested;
  • 57 percent don't want to shell out the extra dough for it;
  • 50 percent say they don't know enough about it;
  • 45 percent say it's "annoying" (whatever that means).

OUR TAKE

AAA's findings jibe with other studies we've seen, and frankly, they're not especially surprising. Given how much trouble our laptops, desktops, smartphones, and tablets can give us, the idea of putting our lives in the hands of a computer on wheels traveling at 70 mph isn't exactly comforting. It's a big change, and it'll take some time to get used to. (News of the first accident blamed partially on an autonomous car isn't soothing anyone's nerves.)

But we will, of course, get used to it. As AAA John Nielsen explains, "With the rapid advancement towards autonomous vehicles, American drivers may be hesitant to give up full control. What Americans may not realize is that the building blocks towards self-driving cars are already in today’s vehicles and the technology is constantly improving and well-trusted by those who have experienced it."

In other words, autonomous cars are following the same slow, stealthy roll-out as electric vehicles did. EVs arrived in phases, going from hybrids, to extended-range electric cars, to vehicles that rely on nothing but batteries. Over the next several years, self-driving cars will follow suit: all those little features like collision-avoidance, automated parking, and autopilot will slowly accumulate, until we wake up one day and realize, "Oh, our cars are driving themselves".

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Study: Most Americans are afraid of self-driving cars
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0306/Study-Most-Americans-are-afraid-of-self-driving-cars
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe