Tesla's master plan receives mixed reactions

Tesla CEO Elon Musk revised and released the company's master plan last week, but analysts are skeptical that Tesla can achieve its lofty goals given the challenges the company faces at present.

|
Lucas Jackson/Reuters/File
A Tesla sign is seen on a building in New York.

Last week, Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk issued an updated version of the "master plan" whose first edition he wrote way back in 2006.

It included proposals for everything from an electric semi truck to the development of fully-autonomous cars that could be shared among owners.

As with virtually all things Tesla, the plan has generated quite a variety of opinions.

Among industry analysts, reactions have been mixed.

Some question whether Tesla can achieve these goals, and whether the company will be able to deliver reliable operating profits for its shareholders—finally—even if it does.

At the same time, some analysts don't think Tesla's plan is that remarkable at all, given what other companies are planning in terms of electric cars and autonomous driving.

The new Tesla master plan may lead to impressive long-term developments, but it will create a short-term "cash-flow sinkhole," Efraim Levy of S&P Global Market told The Detroit News.

In the plan, Musk announced development of a compact SUV, a pickup truck, a semi truck, and an autonomous bus—all of which will require large amounts of cash to develop.

Musk also made the previously-announced absorption of SolarCity a major pillar of the plan, but the estimated $3 billion deal hasn't been approved yet.

Following the announcement of the master plan, Tesla shares were down all day Thursday, closing at $220.50 per share, a decline of 3.4 percent.

Musk also didn't specify any real timelines for the launch of most of the products and initiatives discussed in the master plan, noted a post on the investor site Seeking Alpha.

No launch timelines were mentioned for the compact SUV and pickup truck, and Tesla has missed all of its own first deadlines for new-vehicle launches thus far.

Musk did say that the "Tesla Semi" and autonomous electric bus would be revealed next year, but that could just refer to prototypes; he did not say when actual production would start.

Yet despite the immense costs implied and the vague timelines, it's also possible Musk didn't go far enough with his latest plan.

Another major pillar of the plan is the creation of a shared fleet of autonomous Tesla electric cars that can be used for ride sharing.

But the combination of electric powertrains, autonomous driving, and sharing services is already being pursued by established carmakers like Ford and General Motors, Karl Brauer—a senior analysts at Kelley Blue Book—told just-auto in reaction to the master plan.

In the end, it's likely Tesla's master plan will never make sense as a conventional business plan.

"If part one of Elon Musk's master plan was like putting a man on the moon, part two is a lot more like colonizing the galaxy," Edmunds director of industry analysis Jessica Caldwell said in reaction to the plan.

The plan sounds "overly ambitious," given the challenges Tesla already faces in meeting its short-term goals, she said.

"That said, Tesla's goals are far different from that of other automakers because they start and end with completely eliminating the need for fossil fuels," she concluded.

"Its competition, meanwhile, is focused on mobility solutions first, and energy sources second."

This article first appeared at GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tesla's master plan receives mixed reactions
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0726/Tesla-s-master-plan-receives-mixed-reactions
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe