Trump may reverse auto emissions rules, but don't expect other nations to follow

Other countries have no intention of rolling back their emission limits. This means that any changes Trump makes in the US could be offset by laws elsewhere.

|
Andrew Harnik/AP
President-elect Donald Trump, accompanied by Chief of Staff Reince Priebus (right), takes a question from a member of the media at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla.

With auto-industry lobbyists pushing to have the Trump Administration roll back current and future emission and fuel-economy rules, automakers clearly see the new U.S. regime as more friendly to the needs of business.

And it's possible that indeed, the EPA's vehicle emission limits, the NHTSA's fuel-economy rules, and various other regulations (on safety, on dealer-financing practices, and more) could well be suspended, rolled back, or eliminated.

But there is risk for U.S. automakers in particular if that happens.

As an article in The Detroit News today underscores, the rest of the world—whose governments largely accept the scientific consensus of climate change—has no intention of rolling back its own emission limits.

Which are, in many cases, far tougher than even those currently in place for 2025 model-year vehicles in the U.S.

"The U.S. doesn’t exist alone in the global market," notes The Detroit News, "and electrification and other developments are being led by Western Europe and China."

Moreover, as the Associated Press noted yesterday, the political mood among some members of the European Union is turning from a wait-and-see attitude toward one of defiance.

The dozen or so largest global vehicle makers sell their most popular models of passenger cars and utility vehicles in multiple markets across many dozens of countries around the world.

Those vehicles differ significantly in their powertrains, the degree of safety protection and features offered, and their emission and fuel-economy performance.

But a slackening of U.S. standards will only increase the difference between models sold in North America and those for the rest of the world.

That's not necessarily an unalloyed blessing for automakers, who in their dreams would only have to sell one or two varieties of the same car worldwide.

And with China now a far larger new-vehicle market than the formerly dominant U.S., the risk of having to spend precious capital on an increasingly divergent vehicle lineup to satisfy U.S. buyers is not to be minimized.

Both China and the EU have stringent goals for much lower tailpipe carbon emissions, and China explicitly wants a notable portion of new cars sold to plug in and run on grid electricity.

Slackened U.S. standards, in other words, run the risk of moving a U.S. market that's already less important than it was 20 years ago even further from the global mainstream.

U.S.-style full-size pickup trucks—the most profitable vehicle lines sold by Fiat Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors—are already irrelevant in any major market outside North America.

If the automakers get what their lobbyists are asking for, in other words, it's possible that the Trump administration may be easing a short-term burden only to hurt their global economies of scale in the long run.

Time will tell, as will any spike in global fuel prices.

This story originally appeared on GreenCarReports.

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump may reverse auto emissions rules, but don't expect other nations to follow
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2017/0118/Trump-may-reverse-auto-emissions-rules-but-don-t-expect-other-nations-to-follow
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe