Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Aereo Supreme Court ruling: What it means (and doesn't) for streaming subscribers

(Read article summary)
View video


(Read caption) This file image provided by Aereo shows a streaming broadcast of Bob the Builder on the New York PBS station, WNET 13. The Supreme Court on Wednesday, June 25, 2014 ruled that Aereo has to pay broadcasters when it takes television programs from the airwaves and allows subscribers to watch them on smartphones and other portable devices.

View photo

On Wednesday, in a divided 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of the broadcasters in ABC v. Aereo. This ruling leaves the future of Aereo — a subscription-based TV streaming service — and its many subscribers in limbo, as the justices determined the company is illegally operating as a cable provider in violation of copyright law. However, it remains to be seen whether this case will have the far-reaching implications initially ascribed to it.

It's important to note that the decision doesn't explicitly dismantle Aereo's business model, in which the company captures broadcast signals on tiny antennas and delivers them to customers for $8 per month. Instead, the Court found that this activity constitutes a "public performance" of those broadcast signals, according to the majority opinion written by Justice Steven Breyer.

About these ads

"The majority sees Aereo's activities as being 'substantially similar to those of the CATV companies,'" explained Ars Technica. "If the company survives at all, its business model will have to change drastically, and it will have to pay fees to the television companies it has been fighting in court for more than two years." Those fees will be substantial, thus likely forcing Aereo to alter the way it operates.

Recommended:Cable TV alternatives: Chromecast vs. Apple TV vs. Roku vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3

For what it's worth, cloud technology advocates can breathe a sigh of relief about this decision. "Aereo and some amici briefs tried to make it appear that a decision against Aereo could have sweeping negative ramifications for other technologies, including cloud computing," said Brad Newberg of Reed Smith LLP, an attorney specializing in copyright law who isn't affiliated with the case. "The Court went out of its way to clarify that its decision did not consider and would not affect such technologies today."

Readers, are you disappointed by this ruling? Do you think Aereo will soldier on as a cable provider, or will it shut down?

Marcy Bonebright is a features writer for, where this article first appeared: