Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Protectionism by any other name

(Read article summary)
View video

John Nordell / The Christian Science Monitor / File

(Read caption) Union defense workers protest outside N.H. Senator Judd Gregg's Manchester office. Gregg supports free trade and opposes protectionism. Protectionist tactics protect American jobs in the short term, but can cause economic devastation in the longer term.

View photo

An additional round of “quantitative easing” by the Federal Reserve, or QE2, has been debated by the news media, financial analysts, economists, Sunday morning talking heads, and even Federal Reserve District Presidents. Would it be good or bad? Is it necessary? Will it prevent deflation or lead to hyperinflation?

The main point that should be emphasized is that this is all part of central bankers around the world substituting their beggar-thy-neighbor policies for outright outright protectionists measures by legislatures. The central bankers are all trying to drive down the exchange rates of their currencies in order to boost exports and economic growth. If this continues QE2 may someday be known as Smoot-Hawley 2 after the disastrous Tariff Bill of 1930 which made the Great Depression much worse.

About these ads

The attacks on Chinese monetary policy could lead to disastrous results.

Add/view comments on this post.


The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.