Too much of a good thing? On the futility of market research

A glut of research today may be less helpful than it seems. The Reformed Broker hopes analysts will start taking better advantage of datasets and improved transparency in order to bring a more novel research product to market. 

|
Richard Drew/AP
Trader Stephen Holden, right, works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Tuesday, July 3, 2012. Equity analysts have a lot of research at their disposal, but more information doesn't necessarily mean better information.

Zero Hedge posted some recent commentary from Nicholas Colas (ConvergEx) that discusses the way forward for equity analysts once this macro storm abates.  I particularly liked the intro, in which Nic lays bare the problem for all to see, the utter pointlessness of so much research today:

Suppose for a moment that you are a money manager with just one client, whose investment more than covers your day-to-day expenses at your customary 2% management fee.  The catch to this happy arrangement is that this investor wants a 10% absolute return and will pull his capital if you do not achieve it.  On the plus side, he will keep the money with you for as long as you achieve this bogey.  Drawdowns don’t matter; just make 10%.  Oh, and the performance fee is 50% of anything over that target.

One more catch – you can only use one external resource in your investment process.  Our mystery client wants you focused.  Your choices are:

  • Unlimited access to one major broker’s sell side research and investment conferences.
  • Top-customer status at one expert network of your choice.
  • All the quantitative research resources you would like.  The catch here is that you can only hire a few programmers to exploit this content.
  • Unlimited access to a top-tier macro research firm, with resources deep in every major central bank around the world.

In the current investment environment, the last choice is the lay-up answer.  With asset price correlations near 90% for a wide range of investment choices, the on-off switch to market direction sits in Washington, Frankfurt, Beijing, and other centers of political and central bank power.  The other choices would give you little insight here.  Even those brokerages with excellent macro research and alumni in high places don’t seem to be able to call the twists and turns of macro policy.

That about sums up the last three years or so.

Colas is optimistic that analysts will start taking better advantage of datasets and the transparency afforded us in the internet age in order to bring a more novel research product to market.  Or failing that, they could just continue to rely on "management access" until the last guy out turns off the light.  Whatever, LOL.

Head over for the whole thing and read it when you have some time.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Too much of a good thing? On the futility of market research
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Reformed-Broker/2012/0703/Too-much-of-a-good-thing-On-the-futility-of-market-research
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe