3 views on what the US should do about Iran's nuclear program

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressed the United Nations General Assembly Wednesday, saying Iran is under a "continued threat by the uncivilized Zionists." As the fourth installment of our One Minute Debate series for election 2012, three writers give their brief take on what the United States should do about Iran's nuclear program.

3. A middle way: Contain Iran through deterrence; help its neighbors gain peace and prosperity.

A military strike will delay but cannot stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It will increase support for the Iranian government at home and abroad. And it will cause catastrophic damage in a global economy barely past the worst financial crash since the Great Depression.

Sanctions and diplomacy promise little more. The Russians and Chinese refuse to stop supporting Tehran, and the Iranian government simply isn't interested in negotiating.

That leaves containing Iran, whether it has nuclear weapons or not. Containment denies external success to Iran through measures such as isolation, trade and financial embargoes, noncommunication, and nuclear deterrence.

One goal is to force the regime to abandon its dream of international dominance and, ultimately, to accept regime change at home. Critics object that this will take too long and argue that, in the process, Iran will acquire nuclear weapons. A nuclear Iran, they say, will then enjoy greater freedom of action in the region because of a mutual fear of nuclear escalation.

But that mutual fear can work both ways – as it did for decades in the cold war with the Soviet Union. The greatest danger of a nuclear Iran – that it will use its weapons, presumably against Israel – can be negated through Iran's sure expectation of a catastrophic nuclear response from either Israel or the United States. Beyond deterrence and isolation, though, the US and its allies must foster a world outside embargoed Iran that is so dynamic, prosperous, and attractive that Tehran will be unable to take advantage of any psychological or political leverage it gains by going nuclear.

Protected by an American nuclear umbrella, friendly governments in the region can focus on economic and social development. That will give them the strength to resist Iran's leverage.

For starters, this means bringing real peace to Syria and Lebanon, Iran's proxy states. The solution to the Iranian nuclear problem lies not in Tehran but in the well-being of its neighbors.

Edward Haley is W.M. Keck Foundation professor of international strategic studies and director of the Center for Human Rights Leadership at Claremont McKenna College.

3 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.