Helping China end its cybercrime spree

When Obama meets China's new leader next month, he should show how the rapid rise in Chinese cybercrime not only hurts the US but China's economy as well.

|
AP Photo
The building that houses “Unit 61398” of the People’s Liberation Army is seen in the outskirts of Shanghai. Signs are growing that China’s massive allegedly state-sponsored computer hacking is imperiling its relations with the US, lending urgency to fledgling efforts by the sides to engage on the issue.

In their first official summit, President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping will meet next month in California and talk informally for two days, trying to hash out their differences. If the latest White House concern about China is on the table, the two men will spend a lot of time on intellectual property theft.

Only in recent months has the United States officially singled out China as the origin for much of the cybertheft of American industrial secrets. The effects of this stealing have been huge – a loss of nearly 1 million jobs in 2009 alone and annual losses in income that are comparable to current US exports to Asia. On Wednesday, a bipartisan commission set up to assess the problem offered remedies that suggest the US needs to go beyond persuasion and take action.

One of the panel’s more drastic recommendations is to slap tariffs on Chinese-made imports as a way to make up for all the US losses. Another is to bar any foreign company from joining a US stock exchange if it has used stolen intellectual property.

The panel, led by a former ambassador to China, Jon Huntsman Jr., and a former director of national intelligence, Dennis Blair, even debated the idea that American companies be allowed to counterattack against hackers by damaging their computer capability. Such tit-for-tat private warfare has too many unforeseen consequences to be taken seriously.

It’s unclear whether Mr. Obama will threaten such steps in his meeting with Mr. Xi. The US still needs to balance all its interests with China. One crystal-clear signal to give Chinese leaders is to show them that Chinese companies are being targeted by business rivals and hacking thieves in China itself.

In a major paper last year, three Chinese researchers estimated that about 90,000 people are involved in online crime of various sorts, affecting about 1 in 12 Chinese. The damage to the country’s economy in 2011 was estimated to be nearly $1 billion a year, and growing at a rapid rate.

The researchers, Zhuge Jianwei and Duan Haixin of Tsinghua University and Gu Liang of Trend Micro Inc., also charge that this underground economy on the Internet “does not attract enough concern from Chinese security community and law enforcement agencies.”

“The priority of law enforcement agencies should be to establish legal protection of individuals’ private information and network assets by means of legislation,” they wrote. “The rapid growth of the Chinese online underground economy must be abated.”

Reports of Chinese companies spying on each other’s computer networks have emerged in recent years, echoing the complaints of foreign firms that cite similar corporate espionage. China’s economy is now too well developed to grow by grand theft of copyrights, patents, and trademarks.

Chinese leaders need to know the boomerang consequences of their tolerance of cybercrime. Many wrongdoers only shape up when they themselves feel the effects of a wrong. At the US-China summit in early June, Obama needs to lay out the facts about this global problem. Sometimes a mirror is the best weapon.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Helping China end its cybercrime spree
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2013/0522/Helping-China-end-its-cybercrime-spree
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe