To end partisan gridlock

A new report recommends practical, achievable steps to help government work better.

|
Jason Reed/Reuters/File
A lone pedestrian passes by the US Capitol Building in Washington. A new bipartisan report makes suggests on how to end partisan gridlock in the nation's capital.

You have to start somewhere.

A report today on reducing partisan bickering and gridlock in American politics deserves close attention and consideration. While it doesn’t address all the problems that keep Washington in a bind, it sets forth a number of practical and achievable steps that would begin to break up the logjam.

The political stalemate in the nation’s capital is not simply business as usual. The members of the commission, many of them former members of Congress representing both parties, can personally attest that the political climate today is the harshest in memory. Commission co-chairman Olympia Snowe, a former Republican senator from Maine, declined to run for reelection in 2012 because of a hostile atmosphere that made working across the aisle, a Senate tradition, nearly impossible.

Today’s politicians shouldn’t bear all the blame, however. Polls show that the American electorate has become more deeply divided along ideological and party lines and more wary that those who represent the other party are acting in good faith. They are more likely to stay in social “silos” in which their friends share their political views.

Those with strongly held positions on the far left or far right are also among the most active in participating in the political process, including being more likely to vote in primary elections. Politicians ignore these strongly ideological voices at their political peril.

It’s appropriate, then, that the commission includes recommendations for what citizens themselves can do to change the environment, as well as state governments.

After 18 months of forums and deliberations the 29 members of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Commission on Political Reform have offered a blueprint for steps to take to improve American democracy. The recommendations include the following:

The US Senate should end the use of filibusters by individuals that keep bills from even being debated on the floor. But it also should permit the minority party to have more opportunities to offer amendments to bills.

The US House and Senate should synchronize their schedules so that they are in session at the same time, making cooperation easier. The commission recommends a pattern of three five-day workweeks followed by a one-week recess.

•States should take a bipartisan approach to the once-a-decade task of redrawing congressional districts. Districts should not be twisted into strange geographical shapes to favor one party over another.

•Primary elections, not party-run caucuses or conventions, should determine each party’s candidates. They should be held nationwide on a single date in June.

•Both parties should commit to increasing the turnout for primary elections, with a goal of 30 percent of eligible voters by 2020 and 35 percent in 2026.

•Finally, all post-high-school-age Americans should give one year of service to their country in the form of military service, through civilian service in a program such as AmeriCorps or the Peace Corps, or through other nonprofit groups that serve those in need.

The commission’s recommendation to more deeply engage young Americans is no afterthought: This generation may be among those most turned off by Washington’s “my way or no way” stalemate. Growing up, they’ve known nothing else.

But American history tells a different story, one of Americans working together to find common ground and do the nation’s business. These recommendations are a reminder that steps are needed now to begin to restore a functioning American democracy.

The challenge now is to keep the topic in public thought beyond a single 24-hour news cycle. “We are all determined ... to make sure [the report] doesn’t gather dust, sitting in a bookcase,” Senator Snowe says. To this end commission members will lobby members of Congress and begin a grass-roots campaign called Citizens for Political Reform. Americans who agree with them should jump in to help.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to To end partisan gridlock
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2014/0624/To-end-partisan-gridlock
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe