Long road to trust for the car industry

More scandals have hit the global car industry since revelations about VW’s diesel emissions. Transparency will help carmakers rebuild badly shaken trust.

|
AP Photo
Joyce Ertel Hulbert, owner of a 2015 Volkswagen Golf TDI, holds a sign while being interviewed outside of a federal building in San Francisco April 21. An agreement will give consumers who bought nearly 600,000 Volkswagen vehicles rigged to cheat on emissions tests the option of having the automaker buy back the cars or fix them, a judge said Thursday.

Trust, once lost, can be difficult to restore, as Volkswagen has discovered since the US charged it last fall with emissions cheating. The carmaker’s sales are expected to fall 5 percent this year. But, it turns out, VW is not alone among global carmakers in the need to regain credibility with buyers.

Just this month, Japan’s Mitsubishi Motors admitted it had manipulated fuel-economy tests. French investigators raided the offices of the maker of Peugeot and Citroën cars over irregularities in their emissions. And German officials said General Motors, Mercedes-Benz owner Daimler, and VW will recall 630,000 diesel cars across Europe for “irregularities” about nitrogen oxide emissions.

In addition, the total number of total recalls in the United States hit a record high last year at 51.3 million vehicles, beating out the previous record in 2014. The biggest recall involved defective airbags make by Japan’s Takata Corp.

Obviously, trust in the automotive industry needs repair – especially as it moves toward driverless cars and more automated features. The industry must be as transparent as possible and cooperate with its many stakeholders.

All eyes are now on VW, Europe’s largest car manufacturer, and how well it can recover from its emissions scandal. So far it has worked out a tentative plan with US officials to make amends with American buyers of its diesel cars. And it plans to release a report from a US law firm investigating the causes of its diesel-emissions software manipulations. But it remains unclear how much change has occurred within its management.

One model for VW is the shakeup at General Motors following its faulty ignition switch scandal. Mary Barra, the new head of GM, has changed the company’s culture to be more open and accountable. The US government stated that GM took "took exemplary actions to demonstrate acceptance and acknowledgment for its conduct.”

Regulation of the industry is not enough as vehicle technology becomes more complex and parts are built around the world. Fines and recalls are proving inadequate. Regulators are being forced to rely more on self-certification by carmakers.

The industry must reach out to private groups to ensure compliance with domestic laws. In France, for example, major carmakers have worked with environmental groups to design new ways to measure car emissions in real-world situations, not only in a laboratory. “We have come up with a very strong vision that will give full transparency for our customers,” said Carlos Tavares, head of the French company PSA. “We want to demonstrate openness and confidence.”

The industry’s ability to restore trust need not take an overlong time. It only requires the right actions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to  Long road to trust for the car industry
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2016/0424/Long-road-to-trust-for-the-car-industry
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe