Colombia creates peace before ending a war

To end its long conflict, Colombia’s government and rebel leaders first had to strike agreements on what peace would look like. Only now have they agreed on a cease-fire. It is a novel approach to end other wars.

|
AP Photo
In this Jan. 3, 2016 photo, Orlando, a rebel fighter for the the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia or FARC, hangs a banner featuring the late rebel leader Alfonso Cano with a message that reads in Spanish: "Our dream is peace with social justice," in their hidden camp in Antioquia state, in the northwest Andes of Colombia. The Colombian government and leftists FARC rebels said Wednesday, June 22, 2016, that they have reached a deal on a bilateral cease-fire that would be the last major step toward ending one of the world’s longest wars. President Santos will travel to Cuba Thursday for the announcement with the FARC.

Wars end when the fighting stops, right? And that is called peace?

Not so in the case of Colombia’s 52-year-long conflict between the government and a Marxist rebel group called the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). Over the past four years, even as they clashed in war, the two sides have been building peace through a series of negotiated agreements on specific issues, such as rural reform. Only on Wednesday did they finally agree on the terms of a military cease-fire.

There’s a lesson for other world conflicts in this “peace first” approach. It is that peace must be seen not merely as the absence of war but as a tangible reality. For Colombia that reality has been designed through difficult talks to include interim pacts on truth-telling about past abuses, a measure of justice for victims, an eventual coexistence between old foes, and broad economic and social reforms.

It may sound odd, but the negotiators describe the approach this way: “Fight the war as if there is no peace process and conduct the peace process as if there is no war.” In other words, protect the peace process from flare-ups in the war that might derail it.

What has been key to this mutual building of peace prospects?

Both sides at the negotiating table really began to bond and create trust when they recognized a common experience: that many of their own family, friends, and colleagues had been innocent victims of this long war.

In fact, a dozen victims were present at the talks, which have been held in Cuba. Some 7. 9 million victims organized themselves through elections to create a representative group from both sides. Their presence, along with their demands for peace, accountability, and reparations, could not be ignored.

The victims’ pleas helped create a mood of humility, and even one apology. A rebel commander recently apologized to a village where a massacre took place after rebel weapons hit a church full of people.

Wednesday’s cease-fire agreement, which includes terms for demobilizing FARC’s 8,000 to 10,000 rebels, indicates that negotiations for a full and final peace agreement could wrap up in coming weeks. The complete set of pacts will then be put to a referendum. Once approved, implementation starts.

Under the rules of the talks, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. Each side must know first what peace will look like to them. Then the war can stop. If this approach works, Colombia will have created a model worth trying to end other wars.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Colombia creates peace before ending a war
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2016/0622/Colombia-creates-peace-before-ending-a-war
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe