The Big Apple’s big drop in crime

Killings and felonies are way down as the city shifts police work to focus on habitual lawbreakers. The key: offering a choice to be free of crime.

|
AP Photo
Police officers listen as New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, and NYPD Commissioner Jim O'Neil conduct a news conference Jan. 4. New York City recorded its fewest number of shootings last year and narrowly missed setting a record low for homicides. According to data released Wednesday, the city had 335 homicides in 2016. The city's record low was 333 in 2014. Police officials reported 998 shooting incidents in 2016. Overall crime was also at its lowest.

It’s an odd question: Should police be fighting criminals – or crime? Yet in today’s law enforcement, such a distinction between action and actor is not seen as odd. And this might help explain why New York has achieved one of the lowest crimes rates the city has ever seen.

Last year, New York saw the fewest shootings since it started tracking them. Major felonies were at the lowest level ever recorded. Most important, gang-related killings were down by almost third from the year before.

Police Commissioner James O’Neill accounts for this success by simply saying New York is becoming better at “deeper problem-solving.” The city has indeed tried many criminal-justice reforms in recent decades. And better economic conditions have also helped cut crime. But what is sure is that police are now more engaged with their communities, explaining their work, listening to feedback, and winning allies. Clergy, for example, are enlisted to calm gang behavior. In Brooklyn, anti-violence groups often hold vigils in rough neighborhoods.

This community-focused approach allows police to more easily pinpoint the most habitual lawbreakers and then confront them with a choice: Either be arrested or seek help for their problems, such as job training, counseling, or mentoring.

The key is choice. If police view gang leaders, for example, as capable of a life without crime, then the gang leaders might not see themselves as criminals. Police, in other words, separate the crime from “the criminal.”

The buzzword for this approach is “focused deterrence.” It relies on a view of individuals as potentially open to reform and as separate from their past acts of crime. Police offer dignity and respect to a targeted person, and then hope to see those qualities reflected back.

A recent book by a group of criminologists, “Place Matters: Criminology for the Twenty-First Century,” explains this as a shift of attention “from people to events, from those who commit crimes to the crimes themselves.”

The authors say law enforcement has focused for too long on “what specific types of people commit crime” rather than on prevention of crime itself: “Catching criminals, convicting them, sometimes imprisoning them and sometimes rehabilitating them naturally leads us to the individual as the primary focus of criminal justice interventions.”

For cities still trapped in rising violence, especially Chicago, New York’s success against crime cannot be ignored. The first task, however, is a conceptual shift. And it starts by asking the right question, even if it is an odd one: Are you fighting criminals – or crime?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The Big Apple’s big drop in crime
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2017/0111/The-Big-Apple-s-big-drop-in-crime
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe