Natural gas pipeline for N.J. Pinelands rejected

A 22-mile natural gas pipeline in New Jersey ignited a classic jobs-versus-the environment clash in one of the most ecologically sensitive areas of the nation's most densely populated state.

A New Jersey agency tasked with protecting the ecologically fragile Pinelands region narrowly defeated a proposal Friday to run a 22-mile natural gas pipeline through it.

The decision delighted environmentalists, who had turned out by the hundreds to oppose the plan over the past six months. But it disheartened business groups and union members who hoped to get work from the project.

The application touched off a classic jobs-versus-the environment clash in one of the most ecologically sensitive areas of the nation's most densely populated state.

"This is a great victory for the Pinelands and the environment of the region," said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club. "Today the commissioners said the Pinelands are not for sale."

"The Pinelands is host to one of the last wildernesses in New Jersey," added Dan DeRosa of Environment New Jersey. "We're a tiny state packed with 8 million people, yet we still have wild spaces like the Pinelands."

The New Jersey Pinelands Commission rejected the proposal by South Jersey Gas, which had partnered with the state Board of Public Utilities, to connect a pipeline to the BL England power plant in Cape May County. The plant is switching from coal to natural gas.

But the commission deadlocked 7-7 on the proposal, meaning the measure didn't pass.

Stacey Roth, the commission's attorney, said the applicant can ask the commission to consider a new proposal in the future. Dan Lockwood, a spokesman for the gas company, said it is studying its options.

"We're disappointed, particularly for our customers in Cape May County," he said.

The gas company said that in addition to providing a cleaner fuel source to the power plant, the new pipeline would provide a second transmission vehicle for natural gas to thousands of customers in Atlantic and Cape May counties. It was not immediately clear whether the power plant would seek an alternate means of getting natural gas. A message left with its parent company, Rockland Capital, was not immediately returned.

The pipeline would have run through the Pinelands, which are protected by state and federal law. The commission is tasked with protecting the ecologically fragile region while supervising responsible economic development within it.

South Jersey Gas proposed paying $8 million to a Pinelands fund to help clear the project's final hurdle. Most of the money would have gone to acquire and preserve 2,000 to 3,000 acres of land near the pipeline route. The deal would, in effect, have exempted the pipeline from a ban on new transmission lines in the 1.1 million-acre Pinelands reserve.

The pipeline would have gone from Maurice River Township in Cumberland County to the BL England plant in Upper Township and would run mostly under or alongside existing roads.

Environmentalists fear damage, but labor unions and business leaders want it approved for the jobs and added energy reliability it would provide.

"Voting yes for this project would sound the death knell for Pinelands protection," said Commissioner Leslie Ficcagia.

Commissioner Paul Galletta, who owns a blueberry farm, said a summer storm two and a half years ago devastated his business and convinced him the region needs additional sources of reliable electric power. He voted for the proposal.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Natural gas pipeline for N.J. Pinelands rejected
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0110/Natural-gas-pipeline-for-N.J.-Pinelands-rejected
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe