The modern butterfly has a 40-million-year-old dopplegänger

Scientists recently discovered a Jurassic insect that looked and acted like a butterfly, but is actually only distantly related to the modern winged creatures.

|
Courtesy of Vichai Malikul
In this artist's rendering of Oregramma illecebrosa, the ancient insect consumes pollen drops from bennettitales, an extinct order of plant from the Triassic period.

It looks like a butterfly, it even pollinated flowers like a butterfly, but what scientists found from ancient lake deposits in northeastern China was another winged creature – one that existed some 40 million years before the butterfly came along.

These butterfly-like insects are the long extinct lacewings of the genus kalligrammatid called Oregramma illecebrosa. Although they would evolve into an insect still distinct from the modern butterfly, an existing genus of their ancestry survives into modern day. They are known as fishflies, owlflies, and snakeflies.

With a circular, eye-like marking on its wings, the ancient lacewings is strikingly similar to the modern owl butterfly. More remarkable, however, was their feeding mechanism. Like their modern-day butterfly sisters, the lacewings fed on the nectar of plants with flower-like reproductive organs that produced pollen.

"Upon examining these new fossils,” co-author David Dilcher, a paleobotanist, explains in a statement, “we've unraveled a surprisingly wide array of physical and ecological similarities between the fossil species and modern butterflies, which shared a common ancestor 320 million years ago.”

This phenomenon, Dr. Dilcher said, is an example of convergent evolution, in which two distantly related species develop similar characteristics separately over time.

Led by Conrad Labandeira, a curator at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History, and Dong Ren of Capital Normal University in Beijing, the study entailed the analysis of fossils recently recovered in northeastern China and eastern Kazakhstan using imaging tools. How they discovered that the lacewings fed on seed plants, for instance, was through the meticulous examination of the tiny fossilized remains of food and pollen inside the mouthparts of the insects. It turns out they had long tongues to probe into plants and hairy legs that trapped pollen.

This system of pollination, however, is not quite the same as the modern process that involves angiosperms, or flowers with reproductive parts that are contained with a seed. The plants with exposed reproductive parts pollinated by the lacewings millions of years are called gymnosperms, but they gave way to the emergence of angiosperm.

The study was published Wednesday in the Proceedings of the Royal Society.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The modern butterfly has a 40-million-year-old dopplegänger
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0204/The-modern-butterfly-has-a-40-million-year-old-dopplegaenger
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe