Forget soccer. Can US beat Japan in a giant robot battle?

Megabots, a company that seeks to build giant piloted robots for arena combat, has issued a challenge to its Japanese counterpart. They accepted. 

|
S.N. Jacobson
Produced by the Boston-based company Megabots, Inc. the Mk. II Mech is a prototype designed for robot-on-robot arena combat.

Who would prevail in battle between giant robots, the United States or Japan? We may soon find out.

The founders of Megabots Inc, a Boston-based company that is seeking to build a giant, piloted robot for arena combat, has issued a challenge to their Japanese counterpart Suidobashi Heavy Industries, the manufacturer of the four-legged, piloted Kurata robot. 

They readily accepted. "We can't let another country win this," said Suidobashi artist Kogoro Kurata, who developed his namesake robot along with roboticist Wataru Yoshizaki, in a video response. "Giant robots are Japanese culture."

Gui Cavalcanti, who last year co-founded Megabots with fellow engineer Matt Oehrlein, says in a phone interview that he was inspired by his love of video games, movies, and the concept of putting people into massive mechanical battle suits, nicknamed “mech suits.”

“Matt Oehrlein and I kinda grew up playing Mech Warrior and Battletech video games and watching all the really, really cheesy science fiction movies like 'Robot Jox,' " says Mr. Cavalcanti. "Mechs have been a part of science fiction culture for the last 30 to 40 years,”

“That’s what we grew up on. That’s what we love. At some point we said, ‘Well, we know how to build these really cool robots now. This is the science fiction future we were promised, so why not do this?'”

“It’s really a sport that requires high-end technology. Right now, we’ve roboticized [hydraulic] construction equipment as an affordable means of promoting the bigger idea of a giant robot sports league that would eventually be all high-end technology,” he says. “This battle is really a giant commercial for what this could be.”

Initially, they created just a torso and a right arm. They called their creation the Mark1.

“The campaign fell far short of its goal,” according to Cavalcanti. “Basically the message we received was ‘We’re not excited by this half a robot. We don’t think this could be a thing.' There was a lot of incredulity on the internet.”

So the team worked with Autodesk to use their software to make a simpler version of the robot for MakerFaire in San Mateo, California in May. To that end Autodesk ran a contest in February 2015 to design the armor paneling and arm cannon which were incorporated into the final design giving the MegaBot Mark II, as it became known, giant paintball guns.

But how would the Mark II fare in combat? There was only one way to find out. 

“We had known about the Kurata robot for a while. [Suidobashi Heavy Industry had already created a mech warrior back in 2012.]  If we want to start a battle we need a second robot and we could build one ourselves and then we just thought, well, there is another robot out there,” he says. “Maybe we could just challenge them. So we got this hair-brained idea and we just started. We recorded the movie.”

He adds that what he finds interesting is the way the robots have become a sort of East-meets-West philosophical and stylistic approach to combat.

“The funny thing is that both sides unintentionally, without thinking about it developed these Eastern vs. Western styles.  All of the Mech Warrior series and Battlefront series are all just robots with guns on them with no hand-to-hand combat whatsoever. So that’s the style we emulated. Meanwhile, the Japanese style is very Gundam, very Eastern, very sculpted pretty looking with lots of like shields and swords and swords and fists. The guns are just sort of interesting-looking add-ons.”

Kurata also noted a stylistic difference, "Come on guys, make it cooler," he says in his video response. "Just building something huge and sticking guns on it. It's ... Super American."

Kurata and Suidobashi say they want a metal-on-metal melee, not paintballs.

“I’m not very nervous,” Cavalcanti says laughing. “I think it’s gonna be awesome! I mean there’s a significant likelihood that both robots will be significantly destroyed. That’s how it’s shaping up, but I think that’s OK. I think it’s worth it.

So will this be pay-per-view? Will it take place in America or Japan?

“We don’t know where or when yet,” he says. “We have to circle around with the Japanese and maybe find neutral ground to fight the robots in the most epic fashion possible. But it will be in about a year. It’s definitely on.”

To that end, Cavalcanti has a message for American robot experts and Battle Bot makers.

“If Grant Imahara [famous for being a BattleBot pioneer], Jamie Heinaman or Adam Savage the Myth Busters or anyone into science and technology on TV that we want your help to make this epic," Cavalcanti says. "Let’s do this.”  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Forget soccer. Can US beat Japan in a giant robot battle?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0706/Forget-soccer.-Can-US-beat-Japan-in-a-giant-robot-battle
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe