How bullying a 180-pound robot could help improve disaster response

The newest generation of Atlas shows off some defensive skills in a video released Wednesday by Boston Dynamics. Why learning to deal with meddling humans could help rescue crews.

If robots ever seek revenge on humans, they’ll likely use this three-minute YouTube video released by Boston Dynamics Wednesday as propaganda. 

Boston Dynamics, a Google-owned company that began as a spin-off from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has engineered a number of robot prototypes since its inception in 1992. 

But as the video shows, the latest generation of Atlas may be the most impressive yet. At 5’9” and 180 pounds, Boston Dynamics newest ‘bot is much more human-like than its previous 6’, 330 pound predecessor. The robot uses stereo sensors and Lidar technology to navigate, finding and picking up ten-pound boxes even when a human bully pushes them out of its way. 

In this case at least, all the school yard bullying is for a good cause. The US military one day hopes to deploy Atlas's decedents into disaster situations where human rescue teams may have difficulty finding access, like the 2001 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. For that to become a reality, rescue robots will need some human-like skills.

In the video released on Tuesday, Atlas shows of some human-like balance and stability. After a human shoves it with a hockey stick, Atlas regains its balance by running backwards and then re-attempting to pick up the box. Atlas is also able to stand-up on its own after falling face-first on the floor, thanks to a hockey stick shove to the back by its human nemesis. 

Most notably, the newest Atlas robot is battery powered. 

“Perhaps the most important change this time round is the lack of cables and support tethers,” explains Forbes contributor Brid-Aine Parnell. “This frees Atlas up for all kinds of uses, including search and rescue operations in areas humans can’t enter and basically any outdoor work.” 

Boston Dynamics created the first generation of Atlas for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Robotics Challenge in 2013. In this prize competition, engineers showcase their robot creations with the goal to “assist humans in responding to future natural and man-made disasters.” During the challenge, the teams “guide the robots through a series of physical tasks representative of what might be encountered in disaster zones.” 

In 2013, DARPA named Atlas one of the most advanced robots ever built. But Atlas came in second place because the judges wished to see better durability and power efficiency: requests that seem fulfilled in Boston Dynamics’ new video.

To those in the robot world, Boston Dynamics’ newest prototype is groundbreaking and exciting. But the everyday viewer can’t help but feel sorry for the bullied robot after watching the YouTube video.

“It definitely triggered the uncanny valley response,” Ken Goldberg, robotics professor at the University of California, Berkeley, tells Wired. “I mean, most of us probably had the same reaction when it got pushed around: We expected it to turn around and blast that guy with a laser beam.” 

But Goldberg tells Wired that the physical bullying is what makes the video so impressive. 

“When something sudden and fairly impactful happens to the robot, we call that an impulse, and that’s very difficult for a system to respond to,” explains Goldberg. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How bullying a 180-pound robot could help improve disaster response
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0224/How-bullying-a-180-pound-robot-could-help-improve-disaster-response
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe