Stephen Hawking biopic 'The Theory of Everything' garners Oscar buzz for its stars

The film has gotten mainly positive reviews and many who criticized other aspects of the film still believe that stars Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones are assured a place on the Oscar nominees list. 'The Theory of Everything' will be released on Nov. 7.

|
Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP
'The Theory of Everything' stars Eddie Redmayne (l.) and Felicity Jones (r.).

The Toronto Film Festival often provides a sneak peek at the films and thespians who will be frontrunners in the Oscar race, and with the Toronto debut of the Stephen Hawking biopic “The Theory of Everything,” attention is being paid to the performances of “Les Miserables” actor Eddie Redmayne as Hawking and Felicity Jones of “The Invisible Woman” as his wife, Jane, in the film.

In addition to Redmayne and Jones, the movie stars “The Book Thief” actress Emily Watson, David Thewlis of “War Horse,” and “Game of Thrones” actor Harry Lloyd.

“Theory” itself has received mainly positive reviews so far. Some critics like Catherine Shoard of the Guardian liked the film, with Shoard writing that the movie is “a film of scrupulous ethics and fresh-scrubbed compassion … Redmayne towers: this is an astonishing, genuinely visceral performance which bears comparison with Daniel Day-Lewis in 'My Left Foot' … It manages that rare thing in any movie, least of all a well-upholstered biopic, and that is a realistic relationship, with grace notes, and a bedrock of respect and affection. Jones makes for a formidable opposite number; she's a consistently brilliant actor who needs a breakthrough … Though Redmayne will deservedly hoover up a great swagbag of awards, Jones shouldn't go home empty-handed.”

Variety writer Justin Chang was also won over by the movie, writing that it’s “a sensitively directed inspirational biopic… [it’s] a stirring and bittersweet love story, inflected with tasteful good humor … [there are] superb performances from Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones.”

And some who didn’t like certain aspects of the movie still praised Redmayne and Jones, with Leslie Felperin of the Hollywood Reporter writing that “if the syrupy lows are blessedly few and far between, the highs are not much more frequent. As such, it’s something of a disappointment for fans of [director] James Marsh… Facing the physical challenges of depicting Hawking’s disability, Redmayne pulls it off with enormous grace and endurance, and it’s not just the assist from prosthetic teeth and ears that helps him create an impeccable mimicry of the real man. Jones almost has the harder part in a way … and she holds her own well, although the aging makeup and costumes are less persuasive.” 

Steve Pond of TheWrap agreed.

“Sure, it's sentimental at times in its approach to the the long relationship between the brilliant physicist and his wife Jane … There's no real suspense in his fight for survival or his struggle to continue to communicate his ground-breaking scientific theories,” he wrote, calling part of the ending "too-mawkish." “So instead the movie tells us how it happened, anchored by rich and resounding performances by Redmayne and Jones. The former seems to be a guaranteed Best Actor nominee, but Jones shouldn't be overlooked either.”

“Everything” will be released in the US on Nov. 7.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Stephen Hawking biopic 'The Theory of Everything' garners Oscar buzz for its stars
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2014/0908/Stephen-Hawking-biopic-The-Theory-of-Everything-garners-Oscar-buzz-for-its-stars
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe