Lululemon yoga pant controversy: Namaste turns nasty

Lululemon Athletica founder Chip Wilson raises women's hackles by blaming women's bodies for the shortcomings of some Lululemon yoga pants. Apparently, Mr. Wilson never learned the cardinal rule - never blame mommy's thighs for anything, ever.

|
Andy Clark/Reuters
Lululemon controversy: A customer enters the Lululemon store in downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, November 8.

At last, women can find a Zen moment of truth in advertising as Lululemon’s sheer yoga pants return to shelves, bearing aptly phrased tags that read, “This is what celebrating failure looks like!"

When it comes to taking a good long look at failure, Lululemon Athletica and its founder Chip Wilson have given us an eye full, beginning with the unintentionally see-through pants and ending with Mr. Wilson’s choice to blame women’s thighs for some less than fabulous fabric choices made by the company.

First the $98 pants were recalled in March for being too sheer and then in July a reinforced version, dubbed “Full-On Luon,” replaced them only to be criticized by women for “pilling with wear,” according to Business Insider.

Wilson let fly the following comments during an interview on Bloomberg TV: "Quite frankly some women's bodies just don't actually work for it. They don't work for some women's bodies...it's really about the rubbing through the thighs, how much pressure is there over a period of time, how much they use it."

Now a new incarnation of the pants are on shelves for $92, re-branded as “Second Chance” pants. A tag on the bottom reads: "These pants were inspired by a need to find functional and beautiful design solutions for our sheer pants. This is what celebrating failure looks like!"

However, after failing to take ownership of poor quality control not once but twice and insulting women’s bodies, it would seem that in calling them “Second Chance pants” Lululemon missed out on some basic math and parenting rules.

The rules: 1. A second chance comes after one error, not several. 2. You don’t turn Namaste into nasty unless you want a serious time out. 3. Never blame mommy’s thighs for anything, ever.

I am one of the many parents who does yoga with her children and, even if I could afford a pair of $98 pants, they wouldn’t come from a company that behaves as Lululemon has.

A while back it would have seemed impossible for any CEO to top the sheer arrogance and prejudice exhibited by Abercrombie and Fitch for its stance against big clothing sizes and yet Wilson has managed to attain Nirvana non grata by the seat of his pants. 

While Lululemon didn’t get the pants or the apology right, in the end they produced an excellent example for our kids on just how bad things can get when you refuse to own up to mistakes and choose to blame and insult others instead.

Maybe Wilson never really learned about the five principles of yoga: relaxation, exercise, breathing, diet, and meditation.

Perhaps Wilson needs to relax his grip on his ego, exercise better judgment, breathe the scent of humility, go on a strict diet of high quality standards, and meditate on what he says for a long while before he says it on television.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Lululemon yoga pant controversy: Namaste turns nasty
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/Modern-Parenthood/2013/1113/Lululemon-yoga-pant-controversy-Namaste-turns-nasty
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe