'The Tightrope' shows a master of stagecraft uncloaked

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Director Simon Brooks' documentary follows legendary theater director Peter Brook, revealing some of the techniques he uses to coax extraordinary performances from actors.

|
First Run Features
Theater director Peter Brook leads one of his famous acting workshops in ‘The Tightrope.’

Peter Brook is one of the most revolutionary theater directors of the past half century and yet his techniques, unlike those of so many other legendary theatrical figures, have always been somewhat shrouded in secrecy. In particular, his special performance exercise, “the tightrope,” has been a source of mystification to outsiders. 

Now Brook’s son, Simon, a celebrated film director who previously made the documentary feature “Brook by Brook,” has, with his father’s blessing, cleared away some of the mystery in the French-Italian coproduction “Peter Brook: The Tightrope.” Except, of course, the real mystery remains: How do actors work their magic?

The tightrope exercise is superficially simple to describe. As Peter Brook looks intently on, his actors, grouped together in a small studio, take turns pretending to walk across the carpeted floor as if balancing on a tightrope. Swaying back and forth, lunging, occasionally falling, they do their best to mimic a vertiginous experience. To my untutored eye, they all looked quite convincing. For Brook, even the tiniest inflection of falsehood in the movements registers seismically. He’s like a human lie detector of performance art. 

Brook believes in the intrinsic honesty of the theatrical event. “Be aware of what you are experiencing,” he tells his multiethnic students, some of whom are also dancers and musicians. He asks the tightrope walkers to develop an inward sensitivity, “as if your legs had eyes.” He makes the point that every part of the body should be as expressive as the face. “If the body isn’t alive, the soles of the feet forget.” This kind of hyperalertness is more than a performing trick; it is, for Brook, essential to all great acting. Imagination is fueled by authenticity. 

This is why Brook, from the start, in the 1950s, championed less-is-more stagecraft. The British newspaper The Guardian once wrote of him: “It is only a slight exaggeration to say that, before Peter Brook came along ..., a Shakespeare play in the British theatre meant men in tights declaiming under a proscenium arch amid naturalistic stage sets.” As Brook says in the film, “there is no need for sets if the truth is there.”

Plenty of theatrical impresarios come on like gurus, and their ministrations can seem uncomfortably close to cultish. Brook, by contrast, never imposes his methodology; it simply arises from the work itself. He allows his acting students the luxury of failing, and he understands, as they do, that failure is part of the process. Brook casually says at one point, “I am not an actor,” but, of course, he is. He just acts offstage. 

Simon Brook shot the film, which compresses several weeks’ worth of work, with five hidden cameras. The effect is of eavesdropping on a secret ceremony. The film is a model of cinematic transformation: We never feel that we are watching that dread dodo, “filmed theater.” Simon doesn’t give his father all the good close-ups, either. Each actor’s face is illumined by his or her avidity to get it right, not just to please the director but to enrich themselves. Peter Brook says that what distinguishes the actor from the nonactor is “a certain link between the pure imagination and the body itself.” He always wants his actors to go further into the theatrical experience in order to find “that extra opening when life enters into it.”

For anybody who ever saw (as I did), Brook’s legendary stage productions of “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” or “Mahabharata” (which was also made into a movie), the experience was transformative. To hear him talk about theater here, and unloose some of his secrets, is transformative, too. 

“The Tightrope” may have started out as a nuts-and-bolts documentation of a theatrical workshop, but inevitably it becomes something much more than that – an expression of the elation we feel when we experience theatrical magic. 

With Peter Brook acting as magician, it could not have been otherwise. Grade: A- (Unrated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'The Tightrope' shows a master of stagecraft uncloaked
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2014/0207/The-Tightrope-shows-a-master-of-stagecraft-uncloaked
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe