'Third Person': The interlocking of multiple stories is more confusing than illuminating

'Third Person' is directed by Paul Haggis of 'Crash.'

|
Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics
'Third Person' stars Liam Neeson (l.) and Olivia Wilde (r.).

Writer-director Paul Haggis likes to mash multiple story lines together. The Oscar-winning, vastly overrated “Crash” is his signature movie, and now he’s back with “Third Person,” another drama-orama that, like “Crash,” piles up stories that aren’t all that much worth telling in the first place.

There’s Mila Kunis playing a struggling New York hotel maid attempting to secure visitation rights to her young son, who is living with his artist dad in an expensive loft apartment. The artist is played by James Franco, from whom we haven’t heard much lately. There’s also Adrien Brody as a knock-off clothing designer in Rome who becomes infatuated with a Romanian gypsy (played by Israeli actress Moran Atias) who claims her 8-year-old daughter is being held for ransom. The best of the three stories has Liam Neeson playing a famous, washed-up novelist holed up in a swank Parisian hotel. He summons from America a girlfriend, played by Olivia Wilde, to join him, and their fun soon turns sour.

The best scene in the movie is also its funniest: Wilde’s character, stark naked, is locked out of her lover’s room and, in retreat, scampers helplessly through the expensive hallways. All three story lines eventually interlock in a semimystical way that is more “Huh?” than “Wow!” Grade: C+ (Rated R for language and some sexuality/nudity.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Third Person': The interlocking of multiple stories is more confusing than illuminating
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2014/0620/Third-Person-The-interlocking-of-multiple-stories-is-more-confusing-than-illuminating
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe