Politics, policy, and the nuances between

Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before Congress was a reminder of just how politicized the word ‘political’ has become.

|
Andrew Harnik/AP
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gestures as he speaks before a joint meeting of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu didn’t mean his controversial March 4 speech before Congress to be “political.” The Israeli leader insisted, “That was never my intention.”

By the time you read this, dear reader, the controversy may well have disappeared into the rearview mirror. But the flap was a reminder of the many shades of meaning of the word political

In a certain sense, anything a politician does is ipso facto a “political” act. Would a journalist insist that what he or she is doing is “not journalistic”? Do doctors say that what they’re doing is “not medical”?

I note that NPR has a “politics editor” rather than a “political editor.” This may simply reflect a current tendency for adjectives to disappear in favor of nouns used as modifiers. During the 1840s, the United States fought “the Mexican War.” (The Mexicans call it “the US invasion.”) More recently, the US has been involved in something referred to as the “Iraq War.” Had it been fought during the administration of James Polk, it might have been called the “Iraqi War.” 

“Politics editor” may just be following the pattern of “Iraq War.” Or a news organization that gets some money from the federal government may want to avoid a job title like “political editor.” It may be that political has become politicized, in other words.

If so, what about policy? In politics and policy we have a set of fraternal twins, not quite synonyms, covering between the two of them a range of concepts that some languages express with just a single word.

Politics came into English around 1520, meaning the “ ‘science of government,’... modeled on Aristotle’s ta politika ‘affairs of state,’ the name of his book on governing and governments,” according to the Online Etymology Dictionary. (Of the splendidly ridiculous early variant spellings that the Oxford English Dictionary lists, my favorite is politycques.)

Oxford defines policy thus: “A principle or course of action adopted or proposed as desirable, advantageous, or expedient; esp. one formally advocated by a government, political party, etc. Also as a mass noun: method of acting on matters of principle, settled practice. (Now the usual sense.)”

Politics can refer, rather grandly, to the business of governing, and policy more to the “content” of a particular administration.

In his new memoir, David Axelrod, the political adviser who helped get President Obama elected, relates a dust-up he had soon after the inauguration in 2009 with Rahm Emanuel, the new president’s chief of staff. Mr. Axelrod was fretting that White House insiders were already talking about chucking various commitments Mr. Obama had made during the campaign. This prompted Mr. Emanuel to scream that he was “sick of hearing about the campaign,” and that “the campaign is over.”

It would seem Axelrod had discovered what former New York Gov. Mario Cuomo meant when he said, “You campaign in poetry; you govern in prose.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Politics, policy, and the nuances between
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2015/0319/Politics-policy-and-the-nuances-between
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe