A Mitt Romney-Rick Santorum ticket? Don’t rule it out.

As Republicans in Alabama and Mississippi go to the polls, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are hurling insults at each other. But they could still be on the GOP ticket together.

|
Eric Gay/AP
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum visits with supporters following a rally Monday in Montgomery, Ala.

It’s Southern Super Tuesday, and Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney have been dishing up the insults fast and furious ahead of crucial primaries in Mississippi and Alabama.

On Tuesday, Mr. Santorum went after Mr. Romney’s record as a venture capitalist – a line of attack that he had avoided before.

“Governor Romney has a career as an investment banker and someone who's a private equity guy on Wall Street. I'm not too sure that necessarily commends you well to be president of the United States,” Santorum said on the nationally syndicated show “Kilmeade & Friends,” according to MSNBC.

On Monday, Santorum suggested that Romney is a “socialist,” because “Romneycare” was “a government takeover of one-sixth of the economy.” Santorum was reacting to Romney’s assertion on Fox Business Network earlier in the day that Santorum isn’t conservative enough on fiscal matters.  

Romney had been asked whether he would choose a running mate who is more conservative than he, if he wins the nomination.

"Well, that would preclude Rick Santorum," Romney said. "I find it interesting that he continues to describe himself as the real conservative. Rick Santorum is not a person who is an economic conservative to my right. His record does not suggest he has the fiscal conservative chops that I have."

Santorum reacted with incredulity.

“I’m too liberal?” Santorum said Monday night in an interview with ABC News. “This is the imaginary world of Mitt Romney’s ideology. It’s just sad.”

Romney and his surrogates have repeatedly attacked Santorum for aggressively pursuing earmarks for his home state of Pennsylvania when he was a senator, and for voting for colleagues’ pet projects, such as Alaska’s infamous “bridge to nowhere.”

So, should we cross Santorum off the list of potential running mates for Romney, if the former governor of Massachusetts hangs on as front-runner and wins the Republican nomination?

Hardly. Heated rhetoric is part of the game, and when the time for choosing a running mate comes, the slate is essentially wiped clean. After all, Ronald Reagan chose George H.W. Bush as his running mate in 1980, even after Mr. Bush derided the Reagan economic proposals as “voodoo economics.” Mr. Reagan’s selection of Bush also represented a bit of ticket-balancing, as the conservative Reagan reached out to the more moderate Bush to reassure the electoral center.

Reagan also engaged in another time-honored tradition: choosing a running mate from the field of candidates who had challenged him for the nomination. The advantage there is that the running mate has already been scrutinized by the press and gone through the rigors of debates and high-profile interviews. When John McCain selected Sarah Palin in 2008, the then-Alaska governor had only been lightly vetted by his campaign and had no experience on the national stage, leading to some major stumbles.

True, a Romney-Santorum ticket pits two white guys against the first African-American president. But Santorum, at least, is Italian-American. Putting a minority or a woman on the ticket who is not widely seen as ready or qualified for the second highest office in the land might look like a rerun of 2008.

Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania, helps balance out Romney in other ways. Though both are northerners, Santorum has more populist appeal with blue-collar voters than the wealthy Romney. And while Santorum is Catholic, he also connects well evangelicals, many of whom are uncomfortable with Romney’s Mormon faith. Santorum also brings solid credentials as a social conservative to the table, in contrast with Romney’s evolution rightward on social issues that makes some Republicans uneasy.  

Putting Santorum on the ticket could also help put Pennsylvania, a battleground state, in the Republican column.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A Mitt Romney-Rick Santorum ticket? Don’t rule it out.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0313/A-Mitt-Romney-Rick-Santorum-ticket-Don-t-rule-it-out
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe