Why white nationalists chose Charlottesville

The Virginia city is known predominately as a liberal and cosmopolitan university town – so why did organizers of a white nationalist rally choose this spot?

|
Steve Helber/AP/File
Matthew Heimbach voices his displeasure at the media after a court hearing for James Alex Fields Jr., in front of court in Charlottesville, Va. A judge has denied bond for Fields accused of plowing his car into a crowd at a white nationalist rally.

The white nationalists behind last weekend's violent rally found an appealing target in the historic town where Thomas Jefferson founded a university and an outspoken, progressive mayor declared his city the "capital of the resistance" to President Trump.

For more than a year, the Charlottesville government has also been engaged in contentious public soul searching over its Confederate monuments, a process that led to the decision to remove a statue of Gen. Robert E. Lee. All those factors made this community a symbolically powerful backdrop for what's considered the largest white nationalist gathering in at least a decade.

"We are a progressive, tolerant city. We are also a Southern city," Mayor Mike Signer said. About a year and a half ago, Charlottesville "decided to launch on the difficult but essential work of finally telling the truth about race. That made us a target for tons of people who don't want to change the narrative."

On the eve of Saturday's rally, hundreds of white men marched through the University of Virginia campus, holding torches and chanting racist and anti-Semitic slogans. The next morning, many looked like they were dressed for war as they made their way to Emancipation Park.

They clashed with counter-protesters in a stunning display of violence before authorities forced the crowd to disperse. Later, a car plowed into a crowd of demonstrators, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer and injuring 19 others.

With a population of around 47,000, Charlottesville is a progressive island in a conservative part of Virginia.

The funky, cosmopolitan town is nestled in the rolling foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains. It's known for being home to Jefferson's plantation, Monticello, and the place where the Dave Matthews Band got its start.

The heart of its downtown is an open-air pedestrian mall lined with restaurants, bars and quirky boutiques. Tourists flock to Charlottesville not only for the history and culture but also to visit the wineries that dot the countryside just outside of town.

Charlottesville was easily overwhelmed by the numbers that showed up Saturday, said Ed Ayers, a leading Civil War scholar who taught at UVA for decades before moving to Richmond.

Despite Virginia's bloody part in the Civil War, Dr. Ayers said, the Lee statue does not have a significant historical connection to Charlottesville. The city "did not play a central role in the war at all, he explained, and the statue was not erected until the 1920s, when Jim Crow laws were eroding the rights of black citizens.

Charlottesville was just "a very clear symbol they could go to and have a protest," Ayers said.

The city is proud of Jefferson's university, a prestigious school with graduates that include prominent figures such as Robert F. Kennedy. But UVA is also a school largely built by slaves and where professors had ideological connections to the resistance movement that followed the Brown vs. Board of Education school desegregation decision.

The university did not admit black students until 1950. Last year, figures provided by the school show only 6 percent of students were black.

White nationalist leader Richard Spencer – a UVA grad who was one of the most high-profile speakers lined up for the rally – echoed Ayers' perspective. He said that the Confederate monuments are a metaphor for something "much bigger," referring to "white dispossession and the de-legitimization of white people in this country and around the world."

Saturday was not Spencer's first demonstration in Charlottesville. In May, he was among another torch-wielding group that rallied around the statue at night, chanting, "You will not replace us." Later that month, local right-wing blogger and UVA graduate Jason Kessler applied for the permit for Saturday's event.

Then, in July, about 50 Ku Klux Klan members rallied at the statue, where they were met by more than 1,000 protesters. That, too, made national news.

Oren Segal, director of Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism, said hate groups are eager to exploit media attention.

"When they saw a built-in opportunity to build off the other two rallies, it was clear they decided, 'This is the place. We're going to get more attention here,'" he said.

Virginia's closely watched governor's race, one of only two in the nation this year, also helped draw attention.

Republican Corey Stewart successfully made the statue's proposed removal a key talking point in the GOP primary, which he almost won despite being an underdog.

Mr. Stewart, a one-time state chairman of Trump's campaign, made several campaign stops in Charlottesville. At least one public appearance was with Mr. Kessler.

Katie Straight, who stood outside the downtown theater Wednesday where a memorial service for Ms. Heyer took place, agreed that the city's "democratic" discussion about what to do with the statues had contributed to the scope of what happened Saturday.

"I also think that you have a group of angry people in this country who are looking for a place to physically terrorize those who might challenge their legacy of power," Ms. Straight said. "And Charlottesville, in this historic moment, happens to be that place. I hope and pray it's the last place, but I don't think it will be."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why white nationalists chose Charlottesville
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2017/0818/Why-white-nationalists-chose-Charlottesville
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe