What if Electoral College ends in a tie? Let's just say it's complicated.

Here are four ways that a 269-to-269 tie in the Electoral College could play out in the 2012 presidential election.

4. What if Congress also fails to choose a president and vice president?

Larry Downing/Reuters
Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada (back r.) waits for President Obama at a campaign event at Cheyenne Sports Complex in Las Vegas on Nov. 1. Curiously, it's the No. 2 Senate leader, the president pro tem, who is in line to become acting president, should the Electoral College and the Congress both gridlock over electing a president.

The Senate has a mechanism to break ties, but it's not clear whether it applies to the case of choosing a vice president. The House, however, has no such tie-breakers. If the House falls short of the 26 state-delegation votes needed to elect a president, members must keep balloting until a deal is brokered, a compromise is reached, or a state switches its vote.

In a polarized and litigious campaign cycle, the obstacles to an agreement on an issue as important as the choice of president and vice president would be fierce, ranging from procedural obstruction within the House and Senate to outside litigation to delay or block a result.

At the same time, intense negotiating between political parties and among members of Congress could also produce a solution. As in 2001, a senator may opt to switch parties in a 50-50 Senate in exchange for a committee chairmanship, tipping the majority. The compromise could also be epic: In the disputed election of 1876, for example, Republicans agreed to end Reconstruction and pull federal troops out of the South in exchange for an agreement to choose Rutherford Hayes, the loser in the popular vote, to be president – a decision with long-term consequences for race relations in the United States.

There's already talk on Capitol Hill of the possibility of a senator switching parties in the event of another 50-50 Senate.

If the House is unable to choose a president by noon on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20, then the new vice president becomes the acting president, until the House can find 26 state delegations able to agree on an outcome. 

If both the House and Senate fail to choose a president and vice president, the House speaker could become acting president, until the issue is resolved. If the speaker declines to permanently give up the speakership, as required, the next in line would be the president pro tem of the Senate, typically the most senior member of the majority party. If Democrats hold their majority, the president pro tem would be Sen. Daniel Inouye (D) of Hawaii. Should Republicans win control of the Senate, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah could get the nod.

Curiously, the No. 1 Senate leader, majority leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada, is not in line to be interim president. That's because the office of majority leader didn't evolve until the 20th century and is not included in the Constitution.

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.