Colorado shooting: 'No show of emotion' as suspect appears in court

James Eagan Holmes, the suspect in the Colorado movie theater shooting, appeared bleary-eyed and dazed at a court hearing Monday in which he was advised of possible charges he may face.

|
RJ Sangosti/Denver Post/AP
James Holmes appears in Arapahoe County District Court, Monday, July 23, in Centennial, Colo. Holmes is being held on suspicion of first-degree murder, and could also face additional counts of aggravated assault and weapons violations stemming from a mass shooting last Friday in a movie theater in Aurora, Colo., that killed 12 and injured dozens of others.

Bleary-eyed and seemingly dazed, the suspect in the deadly Colorado movie theater shooting, James Eagan Holmes, made his first appearance in court Monday morning.

Dressed in maroon jailhouse garb and with his hair still colored a shocking orange, Mr. Holmes, who has been held in solitary confinement, did not speak at the brief hearing, in which he was advised of the possible charges he may face.

Cameras were allowed in the courtroom, giving TV viewers their first real glimpse of the man suspected of killing 12 and wounding 58 at a midnight showing of the new Batman movie in an Aurora theater early Friday morning.

“There was no show of emotion,” says Rob McCallum, public information officer for the Colorado Judicial Department, speaking via cell phone from the back of the courtroom.

Holmes appeared with two court-appointed lawyers as the proceedings – known as an advisement where a suspect is advised of possible charges – took less than 15 minutes.

Chief Judge William Sylvester advised Holmes of his legal rights to a jury trial, as well as possible first-degree murder charges against him. The district attorney’s office normally has 72 hours to file charges, but in this case, it will have until Monday, July 30.  Most legal observers expect the death penalty to be on the table.

Holmes has been held in solitary confinement in an Arapahoe county facility since Friday and will not be allowed to post bond.

“What’s happening now involves questions for both the defense and prosecution,” says Daniel Filler, a criminal law expert and professor in the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University in Philadelphia.

First, he points out, the district attorney’s office needs to consider all the elements of filing death penalty charges. “This will involve both public and political implications,” he says, adding, “but it will also have implications on the way the case is litigated.” In death-penalty cases, he says it is safe to assume that there will be far more resources available to the defense

On the defense side, Professor Filler says the insanity defense will certainly be under consideration. But, he notes, Colorado is one of the tougher states in terms of using what is often a controversial defense.

The Colorado insanity defense clause has two requirements, he says. First, the defendant must have been suffering from a genuine mental illness at the time of the crime. “It cannot be something that was drug-induced,” for example, he notes.

Next, he says the defendant must be able to know right from wrong.

“This is a very tough standard because even in the case of extremely mentally ill individuals, most would know that picking up a gun and shooting people in a movie theater was not a right thing to do,” he says.

As a legal matter, the initial court appearance has little significance other than to show the public that the man responsible for a widely covered crime is being brought to justice, says Anne Bowen Poulin, professor of law at Villanova University School of Law in Philadelphia.

The Aurora shooting, a highly emotional case with multiple victims, evokes the same public feelings as cases like the Long Island railroad shooting in 1993, Columbine in 1999, and other such cases going all the way back to 1966, when the acts of former Marine Charles Whitman, the Texas Tower sniper who killed 16 people at the University of Texas, Austin,  caused a ripple of fear, she points out.

Highly public cases such as this typically spotlight the thorny social issues underlying defense pleas that might involve mental illness, she says.

“This case, and those like it, raise questions about mental illness and responsibility. Those questions are likely to play out in the case against James Holmes as the court determines whether he is competent to stand trial and his attorneys determine whether he can and should raise an insanity defense,” she says via e-mail.

Probably the greatest significance of the hearing Monday is that it gives the public the chance to start fleshing out their individual and collective impressions of the defendant. Members of the public will examine Holmes’ demeanor in his public appearances to try to decide whether he is mentally ill and to make sense of these senseless acts, she says.

These cases become a venue for the public to root for the good versus evil in our society, says Filler, adding, “there are many players, just as in a movie, but of course, here they are all real,” and the stakes are so much higher. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Colorado shooting: 'No show of emotion' as suspect appears in court
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2012/0723/Colorado-shooting-No-show-of-emotion-as-suspect-appears-in-court
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe