LAPD shooting of Ezell Ford 'justified,' says report

The Los Angeles police chief and an independent watchdog have found that a fatal close-range shooting of Ezell Ford, a 25-year-old black man, by officers last year was justified, says a LAPD source. 

|
(AP Photo/Raquel Maria Dillon, File)
In a street side memorial in December 2014 with a painted portrait of Ezell Ford near where he was shot when police confronted him on Aug. 11, 2014, is shown near his home in South Los Angeles. The Los Angeles police chief and his department’s independent watchdog have found that a fatal close-range shooting of a 25-year-old black man by officers last year was justified, a department source said Friday night, June 5, 2015.

The Los Angeles police chief and his department's independent watchdog have found that a fatal close-range shooting of a 25-year-old black man by officers last year was justified, a department source said.

However, the findings by Chief Charlie Beck and the inspector general are only recommendations to the Police Commission, which will determine after a hearing next week whether the shooting of Ezell Ford was within department policy.

They were confirmed Friday night to The Associated Press by a Police Department employee with knowledge of the investigation who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to release the findings.

The chief and inspector general both found that evidence supported the officers' contention that they shot Ford because he was trying to grab an officer's gun.

That evidence included Ford's DNA on the gun. A previously released autopsy report in the case also appeared to support the officers' account, police said.

The inspector general, however, found that the officers' tactics were problematic in the way they first approached Ford, saying that they should have kept their distance, pulled their weapons and given him instructions instead of engaging him directly.

The findings, which were first reported by the Los Angeles Times, will be delivered in reports to the Police Commission for a closed-session hearing on Tuesday.

Commission President Steve Soboroff acknowledged that he had received the recommendations along with depositions and other evidence, but said he was forbidden by law to reveal what they said.

He emphasized that it's the commission's decision in the end whether the shooting was within policy.

"The jury hasn't decided," he said. "The adjudication has not happened."

According to the LAPD, Ford was acting suspiciously when he caught officers' attention in August. He allegedly knocked one officer to the ground and was grappling for the officer's holstered weapon when his partner fired two shots. The fallen officer pulled out a backup gun and shot Ford in the back, Beck said last year.

The killing inspired several peaceful protests and marches through Los Angeles, where demonstrators connected the death with that of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, just days earlier.

Ford's parents believe the shooting was unjustified. They have filed a federal civil lawsuit and $75 million claim against the city alleging the two gang officers knew Ford from the neighborhood and were aware he had mental problems.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to  LAPD shooting of Ezell Ford 'justified,' says report
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0606/LAPD-shooting-of-Ezell-Ford-justified-says-report
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe