Skip to footer

Life or death? Jury set to sentence white supremacist

A jury is preparing to decide whether Frazier Glenn Miller, Jr., convicted of killing three people outside two Jewish centers in Kansas in 2014, should be sentenced to death.

|
Alison Long/Kansas City Star/Reuters/File
Frazier Glenn Miller, Jr., given name Frazier Glenn Cross, sits during his capital murder trial in Johnson County Courthouse in Olathe, Kan., Aug. 31, 2015. A prosecutor urged a jury on Tuesday to give the white supremacist he called a "remoreless killer" a death sentence for murdering three people, including a boy, he thought were Jewish outside two Jewish centers in Kansas last year.

An avowed white supremacist will make his final plea Tuesday to a Kansas jury before they decide whether or not he should be sentenced to death for killing three people outside two Jewish centers in April 2014.

Former Ku Klux Klan member Frazier Glenn Miller, Jr., whose given name is Frazier Glenn Cross, was found guilty in August after he told the jury he committed the murders in an act of "patriotism." Conducting his own defense, Mr. Miller is seeking a life sentence for himself; if sentenced to die, Miller would be the first to receive capital punishment in Kansas since the state restored the death penalty in 1994.

The jury convicted Miller in August for the Passover eve killings of three people: high school student Reat Underwood; his grandfather, William Corporon; and a woman, Terri LaManno. Miller was also found guilty of three counts of attempted murder for shooting at three other people, and of assault and weapons charges.

During the prosecution's closing, District Attorney Steve Howe cited a "mountain of evidence" against Miller, who admitted to the shootings but pleaded not guilty, saying it was his duty to stop what he described as the Jews committing genocide against the white race. None of his victims were Jewish.

“I had no criminal intent,” Miller said in court the day of the verdict. “I had a patriotic intent to stop genocide against my people.”

Miller’s case, while extreme, highlights a rise in anti-Jewish sentiment across the United States, The Christian Science Monitor reported last month. Incidents against Jews in the US increased by 21 percent in 2014 compared to the year before, representing a shift in nearly a decade of decline in acts against Jews, according to an Anti-Defamation League audit released in March.

At the same time, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit civil rights group in Montgomery, Ala., has said that Miller represents “a new kind of figure in the hate crime movement because he often seeks publicity,” the Monitor’s Mark Guarino reported shortly after the killings. “He created his own website, ran for state and federal office in North Carolina and Missouri, and published a 2002 autobiography.”

Miller maintained his outspoken persona throughout the trial, talking to both the press and the public, making comments to jurors, and complaining that his rights were being violated. He said he hated Jews, who he insisted control the media, financial institutions, and the movie industry, and wanted to kill as many as he could.

His son, Frazier Glenn Miller III, was among the several witnesses whom Miller called to testify last week.

His son told jurors he loved his father and was surprised by his crimes and the motives behind them. "I don't agree with him at all," the younger Miller said. 

This report uses material from The Associated Press and Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Life or death? Jury set to sentence white supremacist
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0908/Life-or-death-Jury-set-to-sentence-white-supremacist
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe