S.C. trooper pleads guilty in shooting of unarmed black man. How common?

Sean Groubert faces up to 20 years in prison for the 2014 shooting of Levar Jones. More police officers have been charged in fatal shootings in recent years, but they are still rare, with convictions even rarer still.

|
South Carolina State Police/AP/File
South Carolina State trooper Sean Groubert poses for a booking photo. Mr. Groubert on Monday pleaded guilty to charges relating to the shooting incident involving an unarmed black man. He faces up to 20 years in prison.

A state trooper in South Carolina pleaded guilty Monday to charges relating to the 2014 shooting of unarmed black man after a traffic stop.

Levar Jones was walking into a convenience store in September 2014 when Trooper Sean Groubert pulled up to him without his sirens on. The trooper got out of his car and asked Mr. Jones for his license. As Jones turned back to his car, Mr. Groubert shouted, "Get outta the car, get outta the car," and fires four shots in about three seconds.

The whole incident was captured on dash-cam video. Leroy Smith, the state public safety director and Groubert's boss, fired him after seeing the video.

Jones survived the shooting, and the trooper pleaded guilty to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. He faces up to 20 years in prison.

His case closely mirrors that of another South Carolina police officer, and both cases together exhibit how new video technology and increased public scrutiny of how police use lethal force – provoked by a series of questionable police shootings over the past year – has eroded the kind of preferential treatment officers have long enjoyed from the judicial system.

When an April 2015 traffic stop in North Charleston, S.C., spiraled out of control, Michael Slager, a local police officer, shot Walter Scott five times. Mr. Slager initially told investigators that Mr. Scott had attacked him and taken his Taser, but a bystander cell phone video released a few days later appeared to contradict those statements, and Slager was arrested, fired from the police department, and charged with murder.

Kenneth Gaines, an associate professor at the University of South Carolina School of Law, told the Monitor in September that without the video, "things probably would have been a little different" in the Slager case.

In the past officer's like Groubert and Slager may have enjoyed the benefit of the doubt "at every stage of proceedings," Professor Gaines added.

"Now it's probably more equal treatment in terms of how they're treated pretrial," he continued. "I don't think [Slager] has really been treated any differently than anyone else who [would be] similarly situated."

That doesn’t mean that more police officers are getting convicted in fatal shooting incidents, however. In fact, they are rarely even charged.

A dozen officers were charged in fatal shootings in 2015 – the highest number in at least a decade – but data suggest there were over 800 such shootings that year. Convictions are even rarer still. During the past decade, less than 1 in 4 of such prosecutions have resulted in convictions.

Material from the Associated Press was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to S.C. trooper pleads guilty in shooting of unarmed black man. How common?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0314/S.C.-trooper-pleads-guilty-in-shooting-of-unarmed-black-man.-How-common
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe