U.S. Senate's McConnell rules out lame duck action on court

The hard line opens up the possibility of a Democratic president nominating a more liberal justice. Some Republican senators have said they would be willing to meet with the current nominee, Merrick Garland.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., flanked by Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., left, and Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, right, talks to reporters following a closed-door policy meeting at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 15, 2016.

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Sunday ruled out the possibility that the Senate could confirm President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee in a "lame duck" congressional session after the November presidential election.

In several television interviews, Mr. McConnell said Republican senators had no intention of confirming Obama's nominee Merrick Garland, even if Democrats win the presidency and the Senate majority in November. This would open up the possibility of a Democratic president sending the Senate a nominee who is more liberal than Mr. Garland next year.

"I can't imagine that a Republican majority Congress, in a lame duck session, after the American people have spoken, would want to confirm [Garland]," McConnell told CNN.

"That's not going to happen," McConnell told Fox News on Sunday. "The principle is the same, whether it's before the election or after the election. The principle is the American people are choosing their next president and their next president should pick this Supreme Court nominee."

Nominations to the lifetime Supreme Court post require Senate confirmation. But McConnell says the Republican-run Senate will not have a hearing or a vote on Garland.

Republicans have said they want the next president to make the selection, hoping their party wins November's election. Billionaire businessman Donald Trump is the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination.

Garland, 63, is widely viewed as a moderate acceptable to many Republicans. But McConnell said Garland's nomination was opposed by the National Rifle Association and the National Federation of Independent Businesses, two key constituencies for the Republican party.

He told Fox that Garland was not a moderate, and said the Republican majority would not want to confirm him "even if it were soon to be in the minority."

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid told "Meet the Press" that he thought the Republican facade against Garland would break, because some Republican senators already have said they would be willing to meet Garland and one Republican has said there should be a vote.

"McConnell is leading his Senate over the cliff. And I am telling everybody that's watching this, the senators aren't going to allow that," Reid said.

The White House said it would stand by President Obama's nominee.

"We will stand by him from now until he is confirmed and he's sitting on the Supreme Court," White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough said on Fox News on Sunday.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa and Andy Sullivan; Editing by David Clarke and Stephen Powell)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to U.S. Senate's McConnell rules out lame duck action on court
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0320/U.S.-Senate-s-McConnell-rules-out-lame-duck-action-on-court
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe