How activism has changed the way universities deal with rape on campus

Some universities are responding to pressure from campus-rape activists, but it doesn't mean that they have yet won the trust of their students.

|
Betsy Blaney/AP
A picture of a banner at a 2014 Phi Delta Theta fraternity gathering, briefly posted online, read, "No Means Yes," followed by a graphic sexual remark. Here, Texas Tech freshman Regan Elder helps drape a bed sheet with the message "No Means No" over the university's seal at the Lubbock, Texas campus to protest what students say is a "rape culture" on campus.

New statistics on reported rapes on university campuses released by the Department of Education might look, on first glance, damning for the schools with the highest numbers.  Considerable prestige is on the line: two Ivy Leagues (Brown University and Dartmouth College) and another school known as a bastion of left-leaning politics (Wesleyan University) figure among the top five.

But advocates caution that the new federal stats only tell part of the story.

“It’s important to remember that the statistics aren’t reflective of actual rates, just crimes reported to campus authorities or security, and only around campus,” says Alison Kiss, executive director of the Clery Center, a campus-security organization, in a phone interview.

In fact, she adds, campuses with a higher number of incidents logged might simply be taking a more proactive approach to the issue. 

“These campuses are the ones I’m more intrigued at looking at if I send my child to school, because it means campuses are coming forward and reporting," says Kiss. "It’s not an easy feat.”

A number of variables skew the meaning of the stats.  First, students have to file a report with their university.  According to a 2015 study conducted by the Association of American Universities, that happens in only 28 percent of serious incidents.  Second, the university has to report it.  And if the student turns to a campus counselor, where conversations are confidential, the counselor isn’t obligated to turn in a report to be filed with the rest of complaints on campus.

The data reflects the uneven successes of campus activists who in recent years have pushed universities to respond more aggressively to sexual crimes on campus. In returning the issue to the national spotlight, they’ve built on a framework pioneered by feminists in the late 1980s, who battled to change Americans’ very notions of rape.

At the time, most Americans believed that rape was something strangers did to women.  Then came a series of publications – a 1985 study by Kent State psychology professor Mary Koss, and the 1987 Susan Estrich book “Real Rape”, among others – arguing that most of the time, sexual assaults were actually committed by acquaintances.  In the span of just a few years, feminists turned ideas about rape on their head.  Federal legislative reforms followed, particularly in the 1990s, when the Clery Campus Crimes Act required universities to report information on campus crime to the government. 

Current activists’ efforts have spurred legal reform at the state level too, in addition to spurring an advocacy campaign by President Obama.  In September 2014, California passed a law setting standards for sexual consent on college campuses, with New York following not long after. 

The amount of attention focused on the issue has also stirred the federal bureaucracy.  As The Washington Post noted, this year marks the first time the Department of Education has published campus reports of rape as a separate statistic, rather than lumping them into the broader category of “forcible sex offenses.”  And the definition of rape used is that of the FBI – not those of states, which vary.

But as the unreliability of the just-released data suggests, cases often stay buried, or dealt with behind closed doors.  And revealingly, students still don’t necessarily trust their universities to act: In the Association of American Universities survey from 2015, over 63 percent said they didn’t think campus officials would take them seriously if they reported being raped.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How activism has changed the way universities deal with rape on campus
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0608/How-activism-has-changed-the-way-universities-deal-with-rape-on-campus
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe